The Procuracy proposed to completely remove Ms. Truong My Lan from social life

According to the People's Procuracy (People's Procuracy) of Ho Chi Minh City, defendant Truong My Lan has no repentant attitude, gives crooked statements, does not admit the crime, blames the staff, so she should be strictly removed from society. festival.

According to the trial on the morning of March 19, defendant Truong My Lan (Chairman of the Board of Directors of Van Thinh Phat Group) and his accomplices entered the impeachment session and proposed a sentence from the Ho Chi Minh City People's Procuracy.

The representative of the People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City said that in court, defendant Truong My Lan did not show remorse, continuously made crooked statements, and did not admit the crime. In addition, defendant Lan also blamed the staff and defendants at SCB; The consequences of the case are particularly serious, with no possibility of recovery. Therefore, the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People's Procuracy said that defendant Truong My Lan should be permanently removed from society.

The Procuracy stated that during the interrogation days, it was proven that defendant Truong My Lan took advantage of the bank's restructuring, after merging 3 banks, gradually holding shares of SCB Bank - 95%, using Use SCB as a financial tool, withdraw SCB m.oney; Arrange your confidants into key positions at SCB; direct the establishment of "ghost" companies; colluding with appraisal companies to inflate the value of collateral assets; Directed the creation of a large number of false loan applications at SCB; Bribing and influencing people with positions and powers of the State Bank to conceal violations at SCB.

In addition, Truong My Lan also colluded with the owners and legal representatives of related companies to create loans and jointly use and appropriate SCB's m.oney. Not only that, Ms. Truong My Lan also bribed officials and leaders at the authorities to cover up and conceal erroneous information.

In addition, Truong My Lan also met to discuss and directed Vo Tan Hoang Van to bribe Do Thi Nhan (former Director of Bank Inspection and Supervision Department II) with 5.2 million USD, and gave gifts and m.oney to other members of the inspection team to conceal SCB's weak situation so as not to put SCB under special control.

Although defendant Lan did not admit to instructing Vo Tan Hoang Van to meet and give m.oney to Do Thi Nhan, based on defendant Vo Tan Hoang Van's testimony, documentary evidence, and electronic data, it showed that Truong My Lan was The person who directed Van to meet and bribe defendant Do Thi Nhan. "From there, there is enough evidence to determine that defendant Truong My Lan committed the crime of bribery," the Procuracy analyzed.

According to the Procuracy, at the trial, defendant Truong My Lan still denied the crime... while other defendants admitted wrongdoing. Defendant Truong My Lan and his accomplices caused a total loss of more than 498,000 billion VND. Although defendant Lan has achievements, including her time fighting the COVID-19 epidemic, defendant Truong My Lan committed many crimes, using sophisticated tricks, and appropriated a particularly large amount of m.oney, so she requested the Council to consider The trial removes the defendant from social life.

As for defendant Dinh Van Thanh (former Chairman of the Board of Directors of SCB, wanted, tried in absentia), according to the representative of the Procuracy, defendant Thanh actively helped Truong My Lan for a long time. commit a crime... Need to be permanently isolated from social life.

Regarding defendant Bui Anh Dung (former Chairman of the Board of Directors of SCB), the Procuracy assessed that during the investigation and in court, the defendant actively cooperated, declared honestly, and overcome the consequences. The defendant is a first-time offender. , has many achievements in banking activities. However, the defendant committed an organized crime two or more times with sophisticated tricks, so he needs to be permanently isolated from social life.

As for defendant Vo Tan Hoang Van (former General Director of SCB), according to the Procuracy, defendant Van actively helped Truong My Lan commit the crime. During the investigation and in court, the defendant actively coordinated case, confess honestly, commit a crime for the first time, receive a medal... these are mitigating circumstances. However, the defendant committed the crime twice, in an organized manner, using sophisticated tricks, so he needs to be permanently isolated from social life.

Currently, the Procuracy is still continuing to evaluate the role of each defendant in the case.

Cuong Do La's parent company still has 28 billion in cash and must pay 2,882 billion to Truong My Lan Keng09:53:07 14/04/2024On April 11, the Trial Panel (Jury) of the case that occurred at Van Thinh Phat Group Joint Stock Company announced the verdict, with a decision on penalties and civil liability of the defendants and interested parties. related obligations.