The female director was scammed by the former abbot of Vinh Long pagoda with more than 11 billion and almost committed suicide

According to Mrs. P., when she was cheated with a large amount of money, she fell into a very difficult situation.

After nearly 2 days of trial, on the afternoon of April 14, the People's Court of Vinh Long province declared defendant Pham Van Cung (40 years old, living in Vinh Long, legal name Thich Phuoc Ngoc, former abbot of Phuoc Quang pagoda, Tam Binh district). ) life imprisonment. Nguyen Tuan Si (54 years old, practicing motorbike taxi, living in Vinh Long) 3 years in prison for the same crime of "fraud to appropriate property".

The two defendants mentioned above are accused of using many fraudulent tricks of 4 women with an amount of nearly 68 billion dong. In which, defendant Cung is the mastermind. At the trial, Cung refused the defense lawyer and admitted the behavior as alleged in the indictment. This defendant also stated that due to debt, he committed fraud in order to pay debts to creditors first.

In addition, Cung also said that even though he was a cultivator, he still had "the qualities of a human being", accepting the death penalty even though the representative of the procuracy suggested a life sentence.

Ms. HP (50 years old) - Director of a company in Ho Chi Minh City is a victim of many times providing false information to cheat to appropriate money. In 2015, at the program "Bears of Mercy" held in Ho Chi Minh City, Cung became acquainted with Mrs. P., so she invited her to Vinh Long to visit Phuoc Quang Pagoda and the Center of the Fountain of Love.

Cung lied to Ms. P. after building Phuoc Quang Pagoda and the Orphanage Center, Cung still owed 6.5 billion VND because in the past, Buddhists promised to help with construction money but in the end they did not. True news, Mrs. P. lent Cung 700 million dong.

After that, Cung asked some porters at Lang Son border gate to pretend to be kidnappers, use a Chinese phone number sim to call Mrs. P., loudly threatened to ask for money transfer within a week, if no Cung cannot return to Vietnam. Mrs. P. asked to speak with Cung, and they gave the phone to Cung.

The false palace said in a very panicked and trembling voice so that Mrs. P. believed the kidnapping was real, so Mrs. P. believed and transferred more than 5.7 billion VND to the kidnappers to save Cung. When receiving money from Mrs. P., Cung spent 5 million VND for those who pretended to be kidnappers.

In order to continue taking money from Mrs. P., Cung used a Chinese phone number sim to text Ms. P., the content was that Cung owed 7 billion dong and had fled to China, not daring to return to Vietnam. Mrs. P. believes it's true, so she transferred more than 7 billion VND to help Cung. After that, Cung lied that he was sick and owed 4.5 billion dong...

The total amount that Cung appropriated from P. was nearly 18.6 billion VND, Cung returned nearly 7 billion VND to Mrs. P. Thus, the amount of money that Cung appropriated from Mrs. P. is more than 11.6 billion VND.

According to Mrs. P., when she was cheated with a large amount of money, she fell into a very difficult situation. The house was sold by the bank, Mrs. P. had the thought of looking for death. "I have a charitable heart, helping difficult situations but did not expect to be scammed," this woman said in court.

During the trial, defendant Cung also admitted to getting acquainted with many women to have money for personal expenses. In order for the victims to transfer money, the accused made up stories of kidnapping, suicide...

In addition, this defendant also admitted that the list at the Orphanage Center of the Fountain of Love is more than 100 orphaned children, but only actually raised more than 50 children. Every time a charity group comes to visit, Cung lets poor children outside come in, wears central uniforms for benefactors to sympathize, give money...

According to the trial panel, defendant Cung has aggravating circumstances due to repeated crimes, while mitigating circumstances are sincere declarations, repentance, relatives have paid part of the remedial money. As for the defendant Si, who honestly declared, overcame the consequences and played the role of an accomplice, but it was not significant, so it should be considered mitigating.

Except for the remedial amount, defendant Cung is responsible for returning more than 60 billion VND to the 4 victims. The procedural agency has distrained some assets of defendant Cung to carry out remedial work.

Vụ cựu trụ trì chùa ở Vĩnh Long giả bắt cóc lừa đảo hơn 77 tỷ: Bị đề nghị tù chung thân Rosé14:46:12 14/04/2022Hành vi, hậu quả do bị cáo gây ra là rất nghiêm trọng, thể hiện sự xem thường pháp luật