Parents sued by their biological children for m.oney, seeing the amount of m.oney that everyone was stunned

In 2023, a court in China ordered a father surnamed Zhou to return 16,800 yuan (nearly 60 million) worth of m.oney to his twin children.

It is known that he and his wife are divorced and custody of the two children belongs to the wife. However, he always "keeps" the m.oney that the twins were celebrating at a young age on the grounds that he also used to take care of them when they were young.

Although the twins repeatedly asked for the m.oney back, Zhou refused for years. With their mother's approval, the twins decided to file a lawsuit in the local court seeking m.oney back from their biological father.

The court decided that Zhou had violated the twins' legal rights and ruled he must refund 8,000 yuan to his son and 8,800 yuan to his daughter within 15 days of the ruling.

The incident received a lot of approval from everyone, because the parents' retention of the children's m.oney was inherently objectionable, not to mention that the parents of both were divorced, so it was unreasonable for the father to keep the m.oney unpaid.

Earlier in 2019, the People's Court of Baiyun District, Guangzhou, China also completed a lawsuit lasting up to 3 years. The verdict ordered Su's father to return the entire amount of 3,045 yuan (equivalent to VND10.4 million) — including bank deposits and interest — to his 13-year-old son.

Previously, the b.oy's parents divorced in August 2013. Initially, he stayed with his father, from February 2014 to March 2015, he deposited all the m.oney into a bank account in his name, divided into three different installments.

But by the end of 2015, he moved back in with his mother. In March 2016, the b.oy discovered that his father had withdrawn all his m.oney without notice, so he decided to sue in court. The court held that the m.oney was indeed sent by the father but in his son's name. Legally, the b.oy has full ownership. The father is f.orced to refund his c.hild.

In another case, the man and his 3 children successfully sued the mother for taking m.oney worth 560,000 yuan (more than 2.1 billion VND) that should have belonged to the children. The mother must then also pay back the full amount along with interest.

Earlier, in Yunnan (China), there was also a heartbreaking lawsuit that a g.irl sued her parents to take all the m.oney about 58,000 yuan (230 million VND) but refused to pay for her college education. As a result, the court ordered parents to pay 1,500 yuan per month until their daughter graduated. The g.irl's parents had also divorced earlier.

It can be seen that parents keeping their children's m.oney is always a "headache". Parents need to respect their children's wishes, whether "holding" or letting children keep their own m.oney to celebrate their age, they need to have the right handling and education.

Director Le Hoang once caused controversy when sharing his view of "debt".

According to him, "if you ask 10 people, 10 Vietnamese families, there are 9 people, 9 families feel that m.oney is a debt... without ever paying enough."

The director said that the m.oney did not sound loud, but in fact caused many "accidents", anger, quarrels, narcissism and hometown. Because of the m.oney, many people do not dare to visit friends, many workers are heavy hearted when stepping on the Tet bus to their hometown.

"There is also no shortage of cases where wives grind on their husbands, children grimace at their fathers, grandmothers pout at me due to m.oney," he said, adding that if Tet is not sluggish, many people will feel light in their bodies, lightheaded like living in clouds.

"What a debt! How do I get out?" - this question of director Le Hoang immediately caused controversy all over social media.

Wild hotgirl drove a car and rammed the back of her opponent's car and then fled, what did she confess? Hoàng Phúc17:55:56 12/06/2024Recently, Buon Ma Thuot City Police, Dak Lak Province, said they had just issued a decision to prosecute the case, prosecute the defendant, and order the temporary detention of the g.irl who used her car to ram the rear of her opponent's car, intentionally damaging it. asset.