The case of the shipper leaving because of the 375K order: proceeding to clarify the motive of the girl buying the goods?

Lawyer Dang Van Cuong, Head of Chinh Phap Law Office, Hanoi Bar Association, said that the case of a male shipper being 'interacted' leading to his departure due to a conflict over an order of 375,000 VND is very serious, showing signs of crime.

On the morning of January 23, regarding the incident in which a male shipper was beaten to death by 3 people due to a dispute over an order of 375 thousand VND, which occurred in Da Nang, the Hoa Vang District Police (Da Nang City) informed that they are temporarily detaining 3 suspects related to the fight that led to the death of Mr. Tran Thanh (Hoa Phuoc Commune, Hoa Vang District), who was the delivery person for Ms. Tr.Th. in Giang Nam 2 Village, Hoa Phuoc Commune.

Speaking to reporters from a legal perspective, Dr. Lawyer Dang Van Cuong, Head of Chinh Phap Law Office, Hanoi Bar Association, said that the case showed signs of a very serious crime.

According to lawyer Dang Van Cuong, the investigation agency will conduct steps such as examining the scene, performing an autopsy, collecting traces on the victim's body and the scene, taking witness statements, and collecting other relevant documents to clarify and strictly handle the case, which is necessary to ensure justice and social order.

Based on the investigation results, if it is determined that the suspects used a dangerous weapon (helmet) to impact the vital area (head) of the victim with the intention of ending his life or were fully aware that his actions could lead to death, this act will be prosecuted for murder under Article 123 of the Penal Code. This crime has the highest penalty of death.

In cases where there is insufficient evidence to prosecute for murder, but there is evidence of intentional injury resulting in death, the subjects will be prosecuted under Clause 4, Article 134 of the Penal Code, with a penalty of 7 to 14 years in prison.

According to the lawyer, the investigation agency needs to clarify the motive and circumstances of the incident. According to information published by the authorities, in this case, the conflict arose from a small amount of money that the customer had not paid, along with a "bad star" rating that caused the victim to be fined and suffer financial losses. The victim's actions may have been spontaneous in a moment of anger, but cannot justify the violent behavior that led to Mr. Thanh's death.

"If it is proven that the suspects' actions were of a hooligan nature, not only intentionally causing injury but also with the motive of taking the victim's life, then the most severe punishment must be applied.

In addition to criminal liability, the suspects must compensate the victim's family for all damages, including funeral expenses, compensation for mental damage and child support (if any), the lawyer analyzed.

At the same time, the lawyer said that the authorities also need to clarify the motive and role of the girl who bought the goods? In addition to clarifying the behavior that led to the victim's death and the fault factor in carrying out the behavior, the prosecuting agency will also clarify whether the motive for the incident originated from the delivery of the goods or not.

If it is due to delivery, the customer has received the goods but intentionally does not pay for the goods, and also beats the delivery person leading to the victim's death, then the act is considered hooliganism, the person who commits this act may be subject to the highest penalty of life imprisonment or death penalty for murder.

The incident stemmed from a dispute over delivery, and the suspects were appraised by witnesses of the buyer not paying. Therefore, the investigation agency will also clarify the motive of the incident, and the role of this woman in the criminal case.

According to the lawyer, in the case that this person has the same intention to commit the crime, and the same desire for the defendants to beat the victim, this person will be treated as an accomplice, the mastermind or accomplice in the crime. The investigation agency will have to clarify this issue during the investigation of the case, as a basis for thoroughly resolving the case in the spirit that if there is the same intention to commit the crime, they will be identified as accomplices and will be treated for the same crime.

However, lawyer Dang Van Cuong also stated that it is necessary to clarify the labor relationship between Mr. Thanh and the delivery company. Because Mr. Thanh works under the name of "collaborator".

"If the victim performs regular, stable work, the enterprise must sign a labor contract and be responsible according to the law. Avoiding labor responsibility through the name of "collaborator" not only affects the rights of the employee but also creates legal loopholes.

The incident is a wake-up call about labor management, as well as the responsibilities of the parties in the transaction relationship. At the same time, this is a profound lesson about controlling emotions and using violence, because any behavior that exceeds the limit can lead to serious consequences and strict punishment by law," said lawyer Cuong.

Vụ cô gái quỳ xin lỗi hội đồng: 5 kẻ lộ diện, nhỏ nhất 2k10, CĐM đã bị lừa? Hoàng Anh15:27:25 20/02/2025Liên quan đến vụ thiếu nữ 17 tuổi bị tương tác ở công viên Yên Sở, Công an quận Hoàng Mai (Hà Nội) cho biết đã tạm giữ hình sự 3 nghi phạm để điều tra hành vi cố ý gây thương tích.