The case of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang has an unexpected new development, how does the CEO's son and daughter react?

Nguyen Phuong Hang's case has passed for a while, but it is still a topic of public opinion. After a series of lawsuits and complaints were sent, the People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City recently made a new decision.

Accordingly, on April 26, a source said that the leader of the People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City issued a decision to detain the defendant for an additional 10 days (from April 25 to May 5) for defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang (SN 1971, CEO). Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) on the crime of "abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals".

Previously, the Investigation Police Agency of Ho Chi Minh City Police issued an investigation conclusion, proposing to prosecute Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang, Mr. Dang Anh Quan, Ms. Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi, Ms. Le Thi Thu Ha and Mr. Huynh Cong. Tan on the crime of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals.

The Director of the People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City ordered a 19-day detention for Ms. Phuong Hang from April 7 to April 25 to complete prosecution procedures. And it has been extended for 10 days as mentioned above.

Up to now, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang has been continuously detained for more than 1 year and the case is in the stage of research and investigation conclusions for prosecution and trial.

Regarding the detention of the accused during the investigation, lawyer Luu Tan Anh Toan (Director of Luu Vu Law Firm) said: Article 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code stipulates the time limit for deciding the prosecution. within 20 days for less serious crimes and serious crimes, from the date of receiving the case files and investigation conclusions, the procuracies must issue one of the following decisions: to prosecute the accused before the court ; return the file to request additional investigation; suspend or temporarily suspend the case; to suspend or temporarily suspend the case against the accused.

In addition, in case of necessity, the time limit for deciding to prosecute may be extended, but not exceeding 10 days for less serious crimes and serious crimes, not more than 15 days for very serious crimes, no more than 30 days for particularly serious crimes.

"After receiving the case file and investigation conclusion, the procuracies have the right to decide to apply, change or cancel preventive and coercive measures in accordance with this Code. The use of preventive measures during the prosecution period must not exceed the time limit specified in Clause 1, Article 240 of this Code", lawyer Toan quoted Article 240 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

According to the content of the case, defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang, through her YouTube and TikTok social networking accounts, organized many live broadcasts (livestreams) via the Internet to infringe on privacy, affect her reputation, honor of many individuals.

To increase the credibility and credibility of her statements, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang invited Mr. Dang Anh Quan, a doctor of law, lecturer at Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, to participate in her livestreams.

When Ms. Phuong Hang insulted others, Mr. Dang Anh Quan interacted and spoke about related content, contributing to spiritual encouragement and giving Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang the will to perform the behavior. guilty.

The three defendants Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi, Le Thi Thu Ha and Huynh Cong Tan also testified that there was no conflict with the individuals who were insulted by Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang. But because they are employees and receive salary from Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang, Nhi, Ha and Tan have followed the direction of Ms. Hang, helping Ms. Hang to organize many livestreams and post articles on social networking sites continuously. association "Hoang Nhi" and "Ha Lee" to offend individuals Le Thi Giau and Truong Thi Viet Ha.

In addition, Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi, Le Thi Thu Ha and Huynh Cong Tan admitted to using personal mobile phones to draft, post, and share livestreams with personally offensive content. Ms. Phuong Hang, prepare the stage for Ms. Hang to livestream, post content that Ms. Hang directly livestreams personal insulting statements...

Nguyen Phuong Hang smiled, hugged employees, was demanded by Dinh Lan for 3 billion in compensation Đình Như15:43:47 04/04/2024On April 4, the High People's Court in Ho Chi Minh City Ho Chi Minh City appealed the case of abusing the right to freedom and democracy to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals implemented by Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang and 4 co-conspirators.