New details of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang's case: 1 lecturer and lawyer on livestream were not prosecuted

In addition to requesting the People's Procuracy of the same level to prosecute Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang before the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City, the investigating agency said that there was not enough basis to confirm that a lecturer and lawyer participating in the livestream of female CEO Dai Nam said the contents. misrepresentation, insult...

As previously reported, CEO Nguyen Phuong Hang was detained on March 24, 2022 and prosecuted and detained for 3 months. Up to the present time, the female giant has been extended detention many times. The first time in mid-June 2022, it will be increased by 2 months, the second time will be extended by 20 days. By mid-September 2022, Ms. Phuong Hang continued to be detained for another 2 months. It is known that in October 2022, Ms. Hang's son sent an application to the police and the Procuracy for the second time to ask for 10 billion VND to guarantee his biological mother to be released on bail. The female CEO's son wrote in the application, his mother has many certificates of merit for charity activities. The investigation process of repentance, perception of wrongdoing.

Recently, the Ho Chi Minh City Police Department has completed the investigation of the case of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals led by Nguyen. Phuong Hang and his accomplices performed.

Accordingly, the Public Security Bureau of Ho Chi Minh City proposed the People's Procuracy of the same level to prosecute Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang before the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City for the crime of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the rights and interests of the State. legitimate interests of organizations and individuals.

In this case, in addition to defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang, the Ho Chi Minh City Public Security Bureau also prosecuted Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi (Nguyen Phuong Hang's assistant), Le Thi Thu Ha (an employee of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company), Huynh Cong Tan (Head of Communication Department of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) on the crime of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals, as an accomplice. help.

Previously, the People's Procuracy of Ho Chi Minh City had returned the case file twice, requesting to clarify some details related to the case, including the role of some people who acted as accomplices with Ms. Hang. At the same time, the prosecution agency repeatedly extended the detention period for Ms. Hang.

Regarding the case, in the live broadcasts (livestreams) of defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang, there were offensive content to individuals who participated as guests of law doctor Dang Anh Quan and lawyer Nguyen Dinh. Needle.

The investigation agency determined that Dr. Quan participated in the livestream with Ms. Hang 11 sessions from October 2021 to March 2022, lawyer Kim participated in the livestream with Ms. Hang 2 sessions from October 2021 to December 2021.

Based on the assessment conclusion of the Ho Chi Minh City Police on 38 pages of documents translated into text from the statements of Mr. Dang Anh Quan and Nguyen Dinh Kim, the Ho Chi Minh City Police determined that there was not enough basis to confirm that there was content that distorts, slanders or seriously offends the reputation, honor and dignity of individuals; contents of personal secrets, family secrets and private life in accordance with the Law on Cybersecurity, the Law on Press, the Law on Publication and other relevant laws in the field of information and communication. pine.

According to the conclusion of the investigation, from March 2021, defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang, through her YouTube and TikTok social networking accounts, organized many livestreams via the Internet in Ho Chi Minh City to infringe on the privacy of her photos and photos. enjoy the prestige and honor of many individuals.

The first person that Ms. Hang made offensive statements was the comedian Hoai Linh. Ms. Hang said that Mr. Hoai Linh has a relationship with "medicine god" Vo Hoang Yen. In the first stage of the livestream, Ms. Hang accused Vo Hoang Yen of scamming her husband and wife's money, and asked comedian Hoai Linh to speak up, but Hoai Linh was silent.

About singer Vy Oanh, Ms. Hang said that the female singer had an unfriendly comment on Facebook related to her charity activities. With journalist Han Ni, Ms. Hang said that there were statements on social networks that attacked charity activities and destroyed the "Hang Huu charity fund" of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company, so she "responded" to those This.

Regarding the insult to journalist Nguyen Duc Hien, Ms. Hang said, because Mr. Hien made a statement on VOV radio, saying that Ms. Hang's livestream showed signs of committing a crime "abusing democratic freedoms to infringe on interests." of the State, the lawful rights and interests of organizations and individuals".

Other individuals, Ms. Hang said, had statements and posts on social networks aimed at affecting her reputation and honor. Therefore, she also uses social networks to "respond" to those individuals.

Regarding the case of singer Thuy Tien and her husband - former player Cong Vinh, there are no statements or articles about her on social networks. However, Ms. Hang read and consulted information on social networks that the couple's charity work is not transparent, so she "blasphemed" the couple's names in some livestreams.

Regarding the materials used by Ms. Hang to speak in the livestreams referring to the above individuals, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang still holds the opinion that she claims to be referencing online of unknown origin, reading newspapers and dreaming. Ms. Hang also admitted that this information has not been verified and has no valid basis.

(Synthetic)

Ho Chi Minh City University of Law officially spoke about Dr. Dang Anh Quan: Still working normally Rosé11:40:39 27/06/2022When the State agency handles administrative violations of cyber security or prosecutes Mr. Quan, the school will have a basis to handle according to the law on public employees. The school does not have the authority to determine that the person is in violation of the law. On...