Phuong Hang case: Journalist Han Ni was proposed to prosecute for posting the secret of CEO Dai Nam's private life on social media

After being identified by the competent force, in addition to Ms. Dang Thi Han Ni, there was still a third party who slandered Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang - CEO of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company with offensive words.

The Ho Chi Minh City Police have completed the investigation conclusion and proposed to prosecute Ms. Dang Thi Han Ni (SN 1977) and Mr. Tran Van Sy (former Chairman of the Vinh Long Bar Association) for the crime of "abusing civil liberties". owner infringes upon the interests of the State, the lawful rights and interests of organizations and individuals".

The conclusion of the investigation shows that from September 2021 to February 2022, Mr. Tran Van Sy used the YouTube account "LS Tran Van Sy" and Ms. Han Ni used Facebook and YouTube "Journalist Han Ni" to post articles. , recording and broadcasting on these social networking platforms.

The recording session contained the following specific statements:

"NPH uses stimulants to shame artists for their mouths" posted on August 15, 2021;

"Dai Nam Joint Stock Company and anti-money laundering activities" posted on September 5, 2021;

"Does the Binh Duong provincial government hold its head and ride the neck of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company?" Posted on September 10, 2021.

The police of Ho Chi Minh City concluded that the above video content contained false information, causing confusion among the people, infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company, violating at Point d, Clause 1, Article 8 of the Law on Security. network security.

In addition, Mr. Tran Van Sy has many other videos with content that seriously offends the honor, reputation and dignity of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang; content that is untrue, infringes upon the legitimate interests of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company, and infringes upon the honor, reputation, dignity, or causes damage to the lawful rights and interests of agencies and organizations. , other individuals.

During 8 recording sessions, Mr. Tran Van Sy made statements regarding the personal information of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang and Mr. Huynh Uy Dung.

Mr. Sy said that he based on the recording sessions that Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang had previously broadcast, based on legal documents, official electronic articles published about the private life of Nguyen Phuong Hang. Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang and Mr. Huynh Uy Dung.

Therefore, Mr. Sy realizes that he does not need the consent of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang and Mr. Huynh Uy Dung, does not need to double-check to determine whether it is true or false, does not need to post a link to the source of information because the suspect Sy has no share. Share the article verbatim and without the consent of the press that published the article.

During the recording sessions, the accused Sy used a mobile phone to record and broadcast the recording sessions at the lawyer's office in Vinh Long province and the lawyer's office in Can Tho city.

The reason for the statements is because Ms. Hang has made bad statements about artists and the press, demanding to close the artist world, and has words that are contrary to fine customs and traditions, so the accused Sy has a sense of responsibility. voice to limit the negative influence of Mrs. Hang.

During the investigation, the investigating agency determined that LMH (SN 1998, hometown of Vinh Long) was the person who assisted Mr. Sy in editing images, sound, recording and posting recording sessions on YouTube channel "LS Tran Van Sy" ".

Through work, H. admitted to using software to edit images and adjust sound to assist defendant Sy to record and play some video recordings posted on YouTube channel "LS Tran Van Sy". H. did not assist the accused Sy in drafting, collecting content, preparing tools and means for recording and without editing the content that the accused Sy had composed.

Previously, the Ho Chi Minh City Police also identified Ms. Han Ni using a Facebook and YouTube account named "Journalist Han Ni" to broadcast the recording "Does Mrs. Hang have the right to squat above the law?". This video was broadcast on September 3, 2021.

The Ho Chi Minh City Police concluded that Ms. Han Ni's act of posting on cyberspace personal information, family secrets and private life was contrary to the law, violating Point d, Clause 1, Article 17 of the Law on Security. network security.

Ms. Han Ni acknowledged and presented as follows:

During the recording session on September 3, 2021, Ms. Han Ni made statements regarding personal information related to the private life of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang based on part of the information and main content in the articles. Official newspapers were published about Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang. Therefore, there is no need to double-check to determine whether it is right or wrong, without consulting and without the consent of Ms. Hang, without checking, without the approval of the press agency.

Ms. Han Ni identified the statements in the video recording with content related to Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang because she knew that Ms. Hang was also known as Nguyen Thi Thanh Tuyen, the "CEO" of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company and the related to the Nam Cam case.

For Mr. Huynh Uy Dung, Ms. Han Ni learned through the press that Mr. Dung is the husband of Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company and one of the three founders of the charity fund. Hang Huu.

In addition, Ms. Han Ni said that on September 3, 2021, she stayed at her home, using a mobile phone and webcam installed and mounted on a desktop computer to record and post by herself. The video was titled: "Does Ms. Hang have the right to squat above the law? It was broadcast on YouTube and Facebook accounts with the name "Journalist Han Ni".

Defendant Han Ni stated that the reason for the above statements was because Ms. Hang recorded a live broadcast on social networks with insulting words to Ms. Han Ni on September 3, 2021.

Because of the consistency in the testimony and the attitude of the defendants to cooperate in the investigation, there is still no consensus. Therefore, the investigating agency is still collecting more documents and evidence for the prosecution process.

Tòa tuyên phạt bà Hàn Ni 18 tháng tù, vì xúc phạm bà Nguyễn Phương Hằng Phong Trần08:10:05 02/03/2024Chiều 1/3, TAND TP.HCM đã tuyên án phiên xét xử sơ thẩm bị cáo Đặng Thị Hàn Ni (46 tuổi) và Trần Văn Sỹ (66 tuổi) về hành vi Lợi dụng các quyền tự do dân chủ xâm phạm lợi ích của Nhà nước, quyền, lợi ích hợp pháp của tổ chức, cá...