Ms. Phuong Hang will still sue Vy Oanh, responding harshly to the lawyer: Have you read the indictment yet? Go back and study more.

During the questioning of the case, Ms. Phuong Hang refused many times and did not answer the lawyers' questions. Even female CEO Dai Nam made the whole audience burst into laughter when answering singer Vy Oanh's lawyer.

Accordingly, on September 21, the People's Court opened a first instance trial for defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang (born 1972; General Director of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) on the charge of "Abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of of the State, and the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals".

During the questioning in court, two lawyers of Mr. Huynh Minh Hung (singer Dam Vinh Hung, who has rights and obligations related to the case) asked many questions to defendant Hang. The questions revolved around Ms. Hang's behavior towards their client.

However, defendant Hang did not respond. The defendant said the indictment clearly showed these contents and said "the defendant used his right to remain silent". "Everything is shown on the indictment, that's why I'm standing in this trial. Did the lawyer read the indictment before going to court?" Ms. Hang said.

After that, the lawyer invited Mr. Dinh Van Chien - Mr. Hung's communications manager - to answer the question. The chairperson reminded Mr. Chien of Mr. Hung's will expressed in the morning court session on the same day that Mr. Hung withdrew the entire compensation claim because he thought "he did not incur any enmity with Ms. Hang".

Mr. Hung's lawyer and representative responded around the content of defendant Hang's denunciation of Mr. Hung's "charity mobilization" to the Criminal Police Department - Ministry of Public Security. According to them, the Criminal Police Department concluded that Mr. Hung did not violate the law.

Also according to these people, defendant Hang accused Mr. Hung of insulting him to the police, but the police concluded that Mr. Hung did not violate the law.

Next, the lawyer of Ms. Nguyen Thi My Oanh (singer Vy Oanh) also had questions for defendant Hang.

Specifically, Ms. My Oanh's lawyer asked defendant Hang "Why do you continue to livestream?". Ms. Hang replied: "Why are you standing here and still asking why? Go back and study more."

Ms. My Oanh's lawyer asked defendant Hang if she had made a wrong determination, would she be willing to apologize. Defendant Hang replied that he had filed a complaint against Ms. My Oanh for insulting her with the police and had not received a response: "Currently, I am also filing a complaint against Vy Oanh for insulting me at PC02. And I think that being in prison for 18 months is already too bitter. During the past 18 months, has anyone helped fund my heart surgery? All of these people, lawyers consider to be victims, or actually in the lawyer's heart, they are saboteurs or victims. The victims are the people, the poor and sick children, but this is not harm, this is sabotage."

The lawyer asked her if she wanted to retract her words that offended client My Oanh. Defendant Hang replied: "Then who will revoke my 18 months in prison?".

After that, the lawyer continued to question Ms. My Oanh. Ms. My Oanh said: "I just hope to judge the right person for the crime. I heard Ms. Hang say that Ms. Hang suffered a lot of harm that she didn't know when I was pregnant and heard her say that I just wanted to die."

Accordingly, Ms. My Oanh does not request compensation for material or mental damages in cash but wants Ms. Hang to apologize. At the same time, Ms. Oanh asked for a reduced sentence for all other defendants.

"I personally do not know Ms. Hang and the defendants, and have no hatred, so I don't know why such a big story like this happened today" - Ms. Oanh said.

Responding later, defendant Hang said he did not agree to apologize to My Oanh.

Mr. Nguyen Duc Hien's lawyer asked defendant Hang. She identified Mr. Hien as one of the people who "attacked" her. Ask her if she has read the articles about Mr. Hien talking about her. Defendant Hang refused to answer. The lawyer asked if she had any evidence about Mr. Hien. Defendant Hang refused to answer.

Ms. Le Thi Giau's lawyer asked defendant Hang what relationship he had with the lawyer's client. Defendant Hang continued to use the "right to silence".

The lawyer asked defendant Le Thi Thu Ha if she admitted to the above indictment and was it directed by Ms. Hang? The defendant said: "I did not answer."

On the same evening, after deliberation, the jury determined that defendant Hang was the mastermind in the case, had a sincere attitude in declaring, repenting, and repenting; Defendant Dang Anh Quan was relatively sincere.

The jury determined that defendant Hang's motive for committing the crime was partly because the other litigants were also at fault. From there, the court sentenced defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang to 3 years in prison (term of imprisonment from March 24, 2022); Defendant Quan received 2 years and 6 months in prison (term of imprisonment from February 24, 2023); The remaining accomplices were sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison each. The defendants committed the crime of "Abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals".

The jury asked the defendants to compensate Ms. Han Ni and Ms. Dinh Thi Lan for damages of 36 million VND.

The case of Ms. Phuong Hang: What should Vy Oanh do if she does not agree with the court's determination to participate in the proceedings? Keng19:22:19 13/05/2023If Vy Oanh, Dam Vinh Hung, ... do not agree with the status of participating in the proceedings as determined by the court, the person summoned must file a complaint against the decision to bring the case to trial and send it to the court or the procuracies. On June 1, the...