Trial of Trang Nemo: The accused side of "Co" hit first, officially sentenced to 9 months in prison

After the trial was postponed because the defendant Trang was hospitalized in an emergency, on the afternoon of June 16, the People's Court of District 1 (HCMC) opened a trial for Nguyen Xuan Huong Trang (ie Trang Nemo) and his accomplice for disruptive behavior. public order.

Trang Nemo's three accomplices are Pham Quyen Quy, Nguyen Ngoc Khuong (both 23 years old) and Phan Hoang Nam (24 years old). According to records, about 13:30 this afternoon (June 16), defendant Trang Nemo appeared at the People's Court of District 1. "Hotgirl" dressed simply, even though she was wearing a mask, she kept covering her face with her hands and avoiding the lens. newspapers. Arriving in court, defendant Trang Nemo kept holding the file to cover his face.

Trang and his accomplices were prosecuted for the same crime of disturbing public order under Clause 1, Article 318 of the Penal Code, with a maximum penalty of 2 years in prison. At the trial, the defense lawyer for the defendant Trang Nemo asked the jury to review the documents and put the videos at the time of the case for public display. At the same time, it is proposed to extract the videos in the phone of defendant Pham Quyen Quy being seized by the investigative agency.

The lawyer said that when the defendant Trang Nemo livestream, many other people also participated in the fight, but the investigation agency has not clarified. In addition, the defense lawyer for the defendant Trang Nemo also proposed to summon two more police officers present before the time of the incident.

In response to questioning, Trang presented the incident that happened that day because Tran My took pictures of the accused selling goods, then My made an appointment to go to the defendant's shop to apologize. However, here is the appearance of Ms. Pham Le Khanh. "Ms. Khanh went to the defendant's shop and told My, "If it's not wrong, there's nothing to apologize for." At this point, the defendant asked Khanh if he bought the goods, if he didn't buy the goods, it was not related to the case. out," Trang declared.

Nguyen Xuan Huong Trang also said that the incident happened because Pham Le Khanh had a curse sentence. The page presented the defendant asking Khanh "who are you", Khanh said "you are the society", so the defendant snatched the mask to see Khanh's face. The defendant saw Quy beat Ms. Khanh, at that time the defendant did not intervene because the incident happened too quickly.

"When the incident happened, the defendant was livestreaming, the defendant livestreamed to let everyone know that the defendant did not sell such goods," Trang said, and said that if the defendant had acted more lightly at that time, the situation would have been different. It is not right that the defendant pulls Khanh's mask, this is a temporary action.

Trang Nemo's accomplice, defendant Pham Quyen Quy, claimed that because Ms. Khanh wore dark glasses, no one knew who Ms. Khanh was. The defendant hit Ms. Khanh twice in the face because Ms. Khanh said vulgar words to Trang Nemo. Quy said and asked the prosecution agency to summon Khanh's husband because he participated in beating Nam defendant.

According to defendant Hoang Nam, while being controlled by police officers, Mr. Co (her husband Pham Le Khanh) hit him in the face. About the reason why after a year of presenting this, Nam said that after reviewing video clips online, he discovered that the person who beat him was Mr. Co. About this, Ms. Khanh said that because she heard she was beaten, her husband came to the scene. Ms. Khanh admitted that Mr. Co pointed at the defendant Nam's face but did not hit him as the lawyers presented.

According to Trang Nemo and his accomplice, when going out of the store, Pham Le Khanh had vulgar words and said "you don't know who you touch, you go out and watch me" so Trang Nemo went to snatch the mask. of Ms. Pham Le Khanh to see her face.

Speaking about the case at the court on the afternoon of June 16, the representative of the People's Procuracy of District 1, Ho Chi Minh City determined that the charges against the defendants were the right people, the right crimes, and no wrongdoing. In addition, the Procuracy recorded for Trang Nemo and his accomplices a number of details such as sincere declaration, repentance, and good character.

From the above analysis, the representative of the Procuracy proposed the Trial Panel to sentence Nguyen Xuan Huong Trang, Pham Quyen Quy, and Nguyen Ngoc Khuong to 6-12 months in prison and Phan Hoang Nam to 12-18 months. prison for disturbing public order.

According to the trial panel, the defendants' actions caused social disorder. Defendant Nam is a person whose criminal record has not been cleared, so a severe punishment is required. For defendants Trang, Quy, and Khuong who committed their first crime and repented, the trial panel considered mitigating a part of the punishment for the defendants.

Since then, the trial panel sentenced defendants Nguyen Xuan Huong Trang, Pham Quyen Quy, and Nguyen Ngoc Khuong to the same sentence of 9 months in prison; Phan Hoai Nam was sentenced to 1 year in prison for the crime of disturbing public order.

Trang Nemo's shop was suddenly checked by the 'court's army' while the prison sentence was still hanging Jennie17:15:47 09/12/2022The live broadcast on an official social networking site makes public opinion more and more speculative, especially when the sudden inspection of stores often comes with the risk of "more or less good or bad". The recent case that attracted public attention was the story of...