Journalist Han Ni quoted the law, demanding that Phuong Hang's heart surgery fund must also disclose its finances

The female journalist constantly has articles aimed directly at the owner of Dai Nam.

In the past few days, in addition to the "statement war" with Vbiz, Phuong Hang also had to fight a character, known by many as journalist Han Ni. Accordingly, a few days ago, she posted a public forum to highlight the strange things of Mrs. Phuong Hang right on her personal Facebook page.

This female journalist commented: "It's very strange that many people praise Ms. Hang for uncovering the truth, which exposes the truth that the artist is receiving money for charity or something. However, as mentioned in point 1, spreading information without giving any information. there's no evidence that it's against the law, and in fact, no agency has concluded that any artist has received money for charity, she just said it out loud and didn't provide any evidence.

However, many people still believe in Mrs. Hang. While the Facebook and clips with ugly and dirty words of Mrs. Hang only satisfy the curiosity of a certain class, it does not make society better. Hang keeps leading curious people, carrying emotions only makes society go down, no rules at all."

With her fierce nature, it was the female CEO Dai Nam who put the female journalist on her livestream, and exposed the tricks this female journalist is doing with the Hang Huu heart fund.

In response, recently, Han Ni also continued to share as if she didn't want to stop this long-running drama : "What's so hot about the charity profession that philanthropists fight against each other, but no one dares to publicly declare charity money statements?

And how does the law regulate charitable activities:

- Does the Charity Fund have to disclose its finances?

- The artists mobilize for charity, can Ms. Hang ask them to make an account statement?

Here is the legal story:

1. Charitable funds are legal entities and must comply with regulations on financial and tax disclosure.

2. Individuals (artists) campaigning, it is a civil relationship, so there is no dispute, if there is a dispute, the law will intervene and handle it according to the Civil Code. According to the Civil Code, only those who have related rights and obligations (the sender, the recipient, etc.) are entitled to make a complaint, and then the fund must be made public.

However, in fact, individuals who often use prestige and honor to mobilize money for charity should be open and fair to protect their reputation and personal identity.

The Everlasting Fund, the Living Fund... are organizations that, even though they don't campaign, by their relationships or contributions, are required by law to disclose their finances. This is legally binding.

As for the artists, if it's not public, there's obviously a problem. Thus, people should not send money in a non-transparent place, because it is possible that charity money and money for buying branded goods will easily be confused with each other!"

Some netizens' opinions: "I'm stuck with the problem of what to do with the statement, I can play the drama between me and Hang. As for the story I want to talk about, it's two different issues. Those who spend money will force statements, and if they create a fund from public money, they must make clear and transparent statements for the Fatherland Front, that's all. Hang said, if you only need to donate 1,000 VND to the fund for some artists, then it's okay. Those guys are screwed", "Sister Han Ni, if you are a true journalist, you should write articles denouncing artists who have been stealing money from making black and white on you for so many years without Hang wrote, if Mrs. Hang insults her honor, people will sue. Second, the charity fund does not ask anyone to donate, so there is no obligation to ask people to make a statement. .."

Bà Phương Hằng bị Công an Bình Dương khẩn trương điều tra 6 đơn tố giác Rosé08:38:38 27/01/2022Sau nghệ sĩ, đến lượt nữ đại gia phải đối mặt với loạt kiện tụng