Unleash the magic trick to help 4 flight attendants carry 11,48kg of banned substances, difficult to prove innocence

On the afternoon of March 17, Ho Chi Minh City Customs Department held a press conference to inform about the case of 4 Vietnam Airlines flight attendants illegally transporting more than 10kg of synthetic banned substances from France to Vietnam.

Through screening and screening, it was discovered that there were banned substances in the flight attendant's suitcase. After that, Tan Son Nhat Customs Branch temporarily detained 4 flight attendants.

Through inspection, the functional forces discovered inside the tubes of toothpaste and mouthwash brought back by flight attendants with banned substances.

Initially, these flight attendants said that they were asked by someone to carry the above goods to their family, promising to pay more than 10 million dong.

Immediately upon receiving the information, Vietnam Airlines decided to suspend the double duty with 4 flight attendants to serve the investigation.

From a legal perspective, according to Doctor, lawyer Dang Van Cuong (Head of the Legal Law Office, Hanoi Bar Association) said that if it is not proven that these people know well these toothbrushes are banned substances are not enough grounds to handle them criminally.

According to Mr. Cuong, determining whether the testimonies of these flight attendants is true or not will be based on many factors. In particular, it is possible to analyze the price of this type of goods in Vietnam compared to France, see if it is popular in Vietnam, is the shipping fee unreasonable?

Specifically, the cost of transporting 10 million VND with more than 10kg of goods, calculating the shipping cost alone is about 1 million VND/kg, is it expensive or cheap, is it reasonable or not? How is the price of toothpaste in France compared to Vietnam? If it is normal toothpaste, how much profit will it be to ship to Vietnam? Is the shipping cost that much?

What is the quality and price of this toothpaste when comparing prices in two countries... calculate the purchase price, tax, other costs until the selling price is obtained will be the numbers to determine Decide whether to smuggle toothpaste from France to Vietnam or not? If it is illegally transported to Vietnam, can it be sold? How risky does this behavior compare to the potential benefits?

From there to clarify, do the flight attendants know this is a banned substance or not to determine whether there are enough grounds to handle the crime of illegally transporting banned substances? If you lie, your actions and words will contradict each other.

In addition, the investigating agency will also clarify when these flight attendants came to France, how long they stayed in France and with whom they interacted? How many times does the transportation of goods to Vietnam happen, how does it happen, why is it so unusual this time? How did this goods pass through the French airport customs gate, why did it pass?

Also, pull out the phone list to verify contacts, incoming and outgoing calls before during and after delivery; check the phone to identify messages, transactions, information with others and take professional measures to clarify the objective truth.

The number of times the goods were transported, the type of goods, the relationship with the authorities in the process of illegally transporting goods across the border, are important issues to expand this case as well as the basis for this case. to determine whether these female flight attendants are subject to criminal prosecution.

In addition, how is this delivery between strangers and flight attendants done? Do they check or not, if checked why not detect? If you don't check, why trust strangers so much?

Objective behavior will show a subjective sense of knowing whether this is a banned substance or not, this is a key issue to determine whether to criminally handle these flight attendants.

Meanwhile, talking to the reporter of the Tri and Life Newspaper, lawyer Nguyen Ngoc Hung - Head of the Connected Law Office (Hanoi Bar Association) said that through the case, many lessons have been learned from holding the case. and help keep goods at the airport arrested for transporting prohibited goods.

Lawyer Hung added that many people think that they do not know, so they are not guilty and carefree to hold goods for others. But when being arrested to prove the mortgage, it is also extremely difficult. Even in the proceedings, it will take a lot of time and effort to prove themselves "innocent".

In fact, when the case was revealed and arrested by the police, the masterminds of buying and selling banned goods had very sophisticated tricks to prevent and deny the crime. Therefore, the victim almost does not have any information about the target, or the information is very faint, unclear, even fake information.

In cases where the carrier is a carrier, has a shipping invoice and pays the shipping fee, there are grounds to prove that he or she is not required to know what the goods are in it. Except for cases where the goods are known to be banned but intentionally transported, they still have the role of accomplices.

However, for ordinary people, when holding anything for anyone, it is necessary to know for sure what the goods are. Because Vietnamese law clearly stipulates for people who do not have the function of transporting goods, people are forced to know what the goods they transport are.

HOT: 4 flight attendants released, 2 new suspects arrested, about to be revealed, curious identities Hoàng Phúc18:39:22 22/03/2023Police allowed 4 flight attendants of Vietnam Airlines, who brought more than 11kg of banned substances from France to Tan Son Nhat airport, to go home but still had to cooperate with the investigation. On the afternoon of March 22, according to Lieutenant General To An Xo...