Le Tung Van's younger sister, Mrs. Le Thu Van, just showed up and was released on bail due to poor health

At the time the investigation agency prosecuted the case, Ms. Le Thi Van had left her residence, so the Long An Provincial Police Investigation Agency decided to separate another criminal case. following reason.

Regarding the Bong Lai Pure House case, on July 28, a source from the Long An Provincial Police said that, on the evening of July 27, Ms. Le Thu Van (65 years old, Le Tung Van's sister) surrendered at the police station. Ward 15, Phu Nhuan District (HCMC). When she surrendered, Ms. Le Thu Van was in poor health.

Currently, the Long An Provincial Police have sent officers to receive and transfer her to the locality to handle according to the law. Previously, on May 10, Ms. Le Thu Van was prosecuted for the crime of abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals.

On the evening of July 28, talking to Tuoi Tre Online, a leader of the Long An Provincial Police Investigation Security Agency said that after working with the accused Le Thu Van in accordance with the investigation process, this unit accepted received a request for bail due to the defendant's poor health.

It is known that after being released on bail, Ms. Van returned to the "Bong Lai Monastery" in Lap Thanh hamlet, Hoa Khanh Tay commune, Duc Hoa district, Long An and had to take measures to prevent her from leaving her residence. In the case file that has been brought to trial, Ms. Le Thu Van is the biological mother of 2 defendants Le Thanh Hoan Nguyen and Le Thanh Nhat Nguyen.

Ms. Van took on the responsibility with other members to care for and teach children, cook... and was determined to participate in taking advantage of forms of religion, false information, fabrications to Posting content on social networks that offends the reputation of the Duc Hoa District Police, the honor and dignity of others...

According to the investigative agency, Ms. Le Thu Van has an active role in helping and directly committing crimes with Le Tung Van's group. However, this woman ran away and went somewhere unknown. Earlier, on the evening of July 21, the People's Court of Duc Hoa district, Long An province issued first-instance sentences for 6 accomplices of Ms. Le Thu Van.

Accordingly, Mr. Le Tung Van was sentenced to 5 years in prison, Le Thanh Hoan Nguyen, Le Thanh Nhat Nguyen, and Le Thanh Trung Duong were all sentenced to 4 years in prison. Le Thanh Nhi Nguyen was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison, while Cao Thi Cuc was sentenced to 3 years in prison for the same crime of abusing democratic freedoms, infringing upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations, individuals under Article 331 of the Penal Code.

At the time the investigation agency prosecuted the case, Ms. Le Thi Van had left her residence, so the Long An Provincial Police Investigation Agency decided to separate another criminal case. following reason.

Regarding the content of the case related to Ms. Le Thi Van, the first-instance judgment of the People's Court of Duc Hoa district announced on July 21 that the authorities discovered on social networks that there were 2 YouTube accounts with violations. law, there should be a document sent to the police to request handling. At the same time, Duc Hoa District Police also received a denunciation from Mr. Tran Ngoc Thao (ie Thich Nhat Tu).

Talking to PV Dan Viet, lawyer Nguyen Thi Quynh Tho (Interla Law Office) said that the law stipulates that the accused fleeing is not an aggravating circumstance of criminal responsibility and when returning to surrender, it is not. must be a mitigating circumstance for penal liability but only "confessed" is a mitigating circumstance of criminal liability.

In addition, the defendant's sincere declaration, repentance, and voluntary compensation and remedial action will be considered as mitigating circumstances of criminal liability. Le Thu Van's escape may not be an aggravating circumstance of criminal responsibility. However, the decision on punishment is based on many factors, not only on the aggravating or mitigating circumstances of the criminal liability.

According to Ms. Tho, the 2015 Penal Code stipulates that the decision on punishment will be based on the assessment of the nature and extent of the offense, the offender's identity and the aggravating circumstances, the situation. mitigating criminal liability.

The aggravating circumstances and the extenuating circumstances of criminal liability are only one of the factors affecting the type of punishment and the level of punishment. The punishment is only imposed when the accused is found guilty by a legally valid judgment of the court.

The law also stipulates that the accused is not obliged to prove his innocence. The burden of proving the crime rests with the prosecuting agencies.

However, the escape of the accused will hinder the investigation activities, will judge the accused's attitude as unrepentant, not sincere, causing difficulties for the investigation. Therefore, if later the court convicts, the defendants run away, do not sincerely report, do not show repentance, the punishment will also be applied more severely to other defendants. This clause has a penalty frame of 2 to 7 years in prison," said Tho.

The Bong Lai Pure House Case: "weird" testimonies and the legal situation if the denunciation verification is restored Rosé09:12:00 29/07/2022The time limit for further settlement of denunciations and reports on crimes shall not exceed 1 month from the date of issuance of the decision on rehabilitation. After finishing the whistleblower verification recovery, 2 situations can occur. After a few days, the People's...