The case of the dog owner's physical impact, the family challenged: "This is a little bit, it won't work".

According to information from Dan Tri Newspaper, at the office, Mr. D's family apologized to the victim, but one of his companions suddenly challenged: "This is a little bit, it won't work." .

On the evening of February 2, public opinion could not help but be angry after watching a clip of a dog owner affecting a man in the apartment lobby. According to the camera extract, the man saw the stray dog, not muzzled, approaching his son, so he used his paw to push it aside. The owner saw that, his attitude was extremely angry, and he waved his hand, causing the man to fall to the floor. Notably, the victim's son witnessed the whole thing. The boy was clearly scared, holding the toy and crouched in the corner of the cabinet.

After the incident took place, both the victim and the pet owner spoke up. According to the person who made the move, Mr. D.TV felt apologetic and wanted to compensate the opponent for damage. However, Mr. V further explained that his dog is only 3 months old, gentle, loves to joke, so it is loved by many people in the apartment. Forgetting the muzzle because at that time had to run down to the lobby to get the shipper. He felt shock and pity when he saw that his dog was treated like that, so he acted out of control.

'I admit in this case, I was completely wrong and there is no reason to be able to justify that wrong. I just hope that everyone understands me, when I was so shocked at that time, but I did not intend to take action against Mr. Dung. At the police station, I also apologized to Mr. Dung's family about my behavior. Perhaps, because I did not speak well, Mr. Dung did not accept it. There are a few small cases when taking the elevator, this or that sister called me to keep the dog, I was afraid of dogs, I would keep it too, but it's nothing. I think when Dung asked, he asked normally, but I don't think he has the need to pull my dog out. If I asked for it, I would certainly have done it,' Mr. V said.

On the victim's side, according to the examination results, Mr. D was diagnosed by the doctor as: swelling and bruising in the left cheek area, scratches on the left cheek, tearing the left eyelid and right 5 stitches, broken left lower incisor tooth fragment, There is a swelling in the left breast. Immediately after that, Mr. D provided a lawyer to file a lawsuit in accordance with the law. In addition to the physical injury, the family believes that the incident has seriously affected his son's mental health.

"I also stopped because the dog looked small to an adult but was quite big for a child. Even though I reminded the dog owner, the dog owner didn't do anything, the dog got closer and closer, so I used my paws. At that time, the dog owner pushed me so hard that I couldn't react in time, and fell backwards," said Mr. D

"Although my son panicked, stepped back and showed an attitude that he didn't want the dog to come near, I reminded the dog owner who was living in the apartment. However, this person did not make any move to chase his dog out. Because the dog owner did not intervene, my son was approached by the dog and I realized that there was a sign of danger to him, so I pushed the dog away with my foot. Immediately the dog owner rushed to me right in the lobby. At that time, I was afraid to just sit there and take care of my children, "said Dung.

When going to the police station to work, the dog owner apologized to Mr. Dung's family, but a woman accompanying him challenged "this is a little bit, it won't work".

Recently, journalist Ngo Ba Luc also gave a harsh opinion on the case. From the parent's perspective, the journalist said that the father's reaction when he saw that the dog was not muzzled and let loose was a very normal thing. Journalist Ngo Ba Luc also disagreed with the hooligan and uncivilized behavior. It is even said that the owner values the dog more than the life of other people. Whether that dog is gentle or small, it is still necessary to ensure the safety of others. You can't take privacy and force everyone to follow it.