HCMC VKSND HCMC completes indictment, continues to prosecute Ms. Phuong Hang and 4 accomplices

HCMC KSND Institute HCMC has completed the indictment to prosecute Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang (General Director of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) and 4 accomplices for abusing the rights to freedom and democracy to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals.

On August 18, HCMC Institute of Civil Engineering. Ho Chi Minh City has completed the indictment for prosecution before TAND HCMC. HCMC proposes to try the defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang (General Director of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) and 4 accomplices for abusing the rights to freedom and democracy to infringe upon the interests of the State, the legitimate rights and interests of organizations and individuals.

Nguyen Phuong Hang's 4 accomplices are: Mr. Dang Anh Quan (doctor of law, university lecturer), Mr. Huynh Cong Tan (head of communication department of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company), Ms. Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi (assistant of Ms. Phuong Hang), Ms. Le Thi Thu Ha (employee of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company).

According to the content of the case, from about March 3-2021, through social media accounts, Ms. Phuong Hang has organized many livestreams to make live statements about the secrets of her personal life and content that affects the reputation and honor of 10 individuals, including Mr. Vo Nguyen Hoai Linh (artist Hoai Linh), Ms. Nguyen Thi My Oanh (singer Vy Oanh), Ms. Dang Thi Han Ni (former journalist - lawyer, Master of Law Han Ni), Mr. Huynh Minh Hung (singer Dam Vinh Hung), Ms. Tran Thi Thuy Tien (singer Thuy Tien) with her husband Le Cong Vinh, Mr. Nguyen Duc Hien (deputy editor-in-chief of Phap Luat newspaper in Ho Chi Minh City). HCMC), Ms. Đinh Thi Lan, Ms. Le Thi Rich, Ms. Truong Viet Ha.

At the investigating agency, defendant Hang confessed that the reason for the statement affected the reputation and honor of artist Hoai Linh because Hoai Linh had a relationship with Mr. Vo Hoang Yen, but when this defendant asked Hoai Linh to speak out about Mr. Yen's fraudulent behavior, he was silent, don't speak up.

For some other individuals, defendant Hang testified that the statements affecting reputation and honor were due to the fact that these individuals made statements on social networks that affected the image of Dai Nam Company and related to charity activities that lacked transparency.

The 3 defendants Nguyen Thi Mai Nhi, Le Thi Thu Ha, Huynh Cong Tan, although they did not have conflicts with the above individuals, but because they were employees and salaries of Nguyen Phuong Hang, they continuously carried out acts of actively helping defendant Hang.

City Police HCMC identified 3 defendants Nhi, Ha and Tan who performed the tasks of posting on the social network Facebook about the title, time and link to the YouTube channel, TikTok will livestream; print the contents that defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang will speak, give to defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang before the livestreams; prepare and use electronic means and devices to serve livestream and livestream on defendant Nguyen Phuong Hang's social media accounts.

The three accused also participated in hosting livestreams, announcing the number of viewers, reading comments on livestreams, etc.

In addition, to increase the credibility of his statements, Nguyen Phuong Hang invited Dang Anh Quan (Doctor of Law, University lecturer) to participate in his livestream.

In particular, Mr. Quan has repeatedly spoken, commented and interacted with defendant Hang about contents that seriously offended the honor, prestige and dignity of many individuals, "contributing to spiritual encouragement and invigorating Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang to commit criminal acts".

Earlier, on May 31, TAND HCMC. HCMC has returned the dossier to the HCMC Institute of Civil Engineering. HCMC, proposed to investigate 3 additional contents, notably 2 requests to clarify the behavior of Mr. Huynh Uy Dung (Chairman of the Board of Directors of Dai Nam Joint Stock Company) whether there were accomplices with Nguyen Phuong Hang, when there were times when Mr. Dung participated in livestreams at Dai Nam Joint Stock Company, at home; request clarification of acts showing signs of humiliating or slandering others under articles 155 and 156 of the Penal Code.

However, during the additional investigation, the City Police. HCM upheld its position on the case. Regarding Mr. Huynh Uy Dung's behavior, the CSI determined that there were insufficient grounds to constitute a crime.

According to the indictment, the HCMC KSND Institute. HCMC shares the same view with the CSI that Mr. Huynh Uy Dung's behavior does not constitute a crime. The indictment of the case has now been filed by the HCMC KSND Institute. HCM served the accused in the case.

Nam Em có là "Nguyễn Phương Hằng thứ 2" khi liên tục livestream kể tội showbiz? An Nhi13:34:08 22/02/2024Thời gian vừa qua, dư luận xôn xao trước những màn livestream của Nam Em. Theo đó, nữ hoa khôi bất ngờ kể sạch những gì mình biết về giới giải trí. Hành động này khiến nhiều người e ngại Nam Em sẽ đi vào vết xe đổ của bà Nguyễn Phương Hằng.