NEW: Lawyer exposes false testimony of biological father, blames stepmother for abusing baby VA

Lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom said that VA's biological father had testimonies to escape the crime of accomplices and transferred all responsibility to his step-aunt Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang. "I saw that Trang beat An very badly, very brutally, but I don't understand why I haven't taken action for a long time to stop..." - Thai confessed

Regarding the case of an 8-year-old girl who was violently abused to death by her step-aunt and biological father, public opinion was outraged. After nearly 1 year of investigation, taking statements and collecting evidence. On July 21, the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City said it would hear the cases of "murder", "torture others" and "hidden crimes" against Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang (SN 1995, residing in Gia Lai province) and Nguyen Kim. Trung Thai (SN 1985, living in District 1). Previously, the City People's Court. Ho Chi Minh City plans to hear the case behind closed doors. However, before the mixed reaction of the public and the victim's family. Therefore, the above case will take place in public form.

As the legal representative for VA baby, Lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom constantly updates the process of working with the authorities. The lawyer also proposed to change the charge from torture - concealing a crime to accomplice in murder for Trung Thai's biological father.

Recently, Lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom could not hide his frustration when he published many testimonies of two subjects. Especially the attitude of refusing responsibility and deceitful behavior of the baby VA's biological father Specifically, at the Thai authorities, he confessed that he had made a phone call and advised his girlfriend to stop her abusive behavior before the time of baby VA's death. . However, the authorities confirmed the date at about 3pm on December 22, 2021, Trang did not hear any calls from Thailand. The biological father also said that the cause of death of baby VA was due to being "physically affected" by a lover for a long time. In his testimony, Thai said that he realized that Trang's behavior was barbaric and anti-educational, but still let the subject abuse an 8-year-old girl. Attached to the article are many images, camera extracts showing the crimes of the two subjects above. The lawyer also added that the swearing lines during the abuse will shock many people because they are so inhumane.

Sophisticated testimony to deny the crime of accomplice Murder blamed on Trang (witnessed by the defense lawyer) at the Ho Chi Minh City Police Investigation Agency on April 12, 14, 2022:

"I don't agree to let Trang beat her children... I realize that Trang hitting, cursing and humiliating Van An like forcing her to hide in a dog house, not allowing her to wear pants is an unacceptable act of violence, isn't it? It is a form of education.... In my opinion, Trang's beating of Van An in many forms for a long time was the cause of Van An's death..."

"At 14:00 on December 22, 2021 (the day Van An was killed), the accused went to the company. About 1 hour later, feeling restless, in the morning Van An had not memorized the lesson, opened it to see how she was studying and saw Trang. I was beating Van An, I immediately asked to go out and call Trang to say: I promised not to hit my son anymore, why do I continue to beat him, don't hit me anymore Poor Trang did not answer, I hung up and continued the meeting until 17:45. packing up things to go home... the accused went up to the house to see Van An lying still, panicked, said and did not remember what..."

"I asked the Investigation Agency to contact my family... to ask my sister to hire a lawyer to defend me..."

LAWYER POINTS PERFORMANCE.

Thai's fault in this case is the indirect intentional error specified in Clause 2, Article 10 of the Penal Code "The offender is well aware that his act is dangerous to society; foresees the consequences of his act. It can happen; although it is undesirable, it is still conscious to let the consequences happen".

On the other hand, at 15:00 on December 22, 2021, when Thai was at the company, he knew very well that Trang was using force to beat her son very brutally, cruelly, possibly endangering his life, but he ignored the consequences. happen. Thai said calling Trang to dissuade "don't beat the poor child" was an excuse to deny responsibility to blame Trang for beating the baby to death.

Thai said that he called Trang to intervene, but the case file did not extract Thai's phone number who called Trang's phone number at 15:00 on December 22, 2022. On the other hand, extracting the audio file and the extracted clip image has no basis to prove that Trang listened to Thai's phone call while beating and cursing Van An very fiercely, brutally, cruelly...

From the above grounds, in the opinion of the lawyer, there is a basis to identify Nguyen Kim Trung Thai as an accomplice to Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang in the role of the mastermind to kill his son. Even though the subjects are educated, law-savvy people, they should try to argue to avoid responsibility, but the truth is only one and can never change justice, especially in murder cases, depriving people of the right to life is the most noble human right. Van An's death could not only be carried out by the subject of Trang, but also had the cold unity of the most evil person, whom she called "dad". They are too cruel, so cruel that they no longer deserve to be human, and even less have the right to force me to call the two sacred words "Father-Mother".

NÓNG: Luật sư tung trích xuất camera tố cáo người bố tiếp tay dì ghẻ bạo hành bé gái 8 tuổi Nam Phu01b0u01a1ng10:40:52 27/06/2022Trong trích xuất camera, Nguyễn Kim Trung Thái chẳng những không có động thái can ngăn, ngược lại còn tiếp tay cho người tình bạo hành con gái ruột. Theo Luật sư, Thái mới là kẻ chủ mưu trong việc hành hạ, gây ra án mạng thương tâm