Ms. Phuong Hang announced that she won the lawsuit in the US, Trang Tran made a strange move!

Recently, Ms. Nguyen Phuong Hang has continued to attract the attention of the public with dense livestreams. Her statements are often controversial, becoming a topic for many YouTubers to participate in commenting, criticizing, and even distorting.

Frustrated because she thought she and her family were offended, Ms. Hang decided to spend a large amount of money, believed to be up to millions of dollars, to hire a group of lawyers who had worked with former US President Donald Trump to sue a series of YouTubers.

Not stopping there, the businesswoman also went directly to the US to monitor the lawsuit. On September 30, she, her husband and the legal team appeared in court, attracting the attention of the Vietnamese community.

After hours of intense debate, she and her supporters walked outside, claiming victory. The atmosphere of joy spread, the companions said that during the trial, some YouTubers were harshly questioned, and the court was forced to delete some videos.

However, the opposing side said that this is not exactly the case. The defendants said the court only ordered the removal of certain videos, not the entirety. They also emphasized that Ms. Hang can still be mentioned within the scope of comments, because according to US law, freedom of expression is always protected. It is the difference in interpretation that makes public opinion stir, many opinions question who is really the winner.

Immediately after the hearing, a social media account gave a specific analysis. This person wrote: "The case went to court yesterday, according to the investigation of why each side said they won. Lawyer Ms. Nguyen Phuong put forward 2 demands:

All clips about her and her family had to be deleted because this endangered her family. For this reason, the judge approved, but he asked Ms. Hang's lawyer to provide a link to the above clips, that is, Ms. Hang won this point.

The second part of the requirement was to force YouTubers not to mention her by name or talk about her during the trial, the judge said that America is strong because of the First Amendment, and he pointed out that there were hundreds of people in the trial, proving that everyone cared because Ms. Hang was a public figure (i.e. a public figure). therefore, he rejected this request, which means that 3 Youtubers Nam Quang, Tien Dung and My Phung won".

This person also explained the reason why Ms. Hang was able to claim that she won: "The reason why Ms. Hang declared victory was because of the A point just mentioned, and at the same time she sued 6 people, but only 3 people went to court, which means that the other 3 people did not go to court, that is, automatically lost. therefore, Ms. Hang declared victory also... It's not wrong."

This person also noted that this is only a hearing, that is, the stage when the court listens to the views of both parties before deciding whether to officially accept the lawsuit or not. In December, the two sides will attend a mediation session. If an agreement is not reached, the judge will consider opening the case or dismissing it. In the event that the lawsuit is continued, the defendant can file a motion to dismiss, or even use the opposite lawsuit tactic.

According to the source, after completing the first round of lawsuits with 6 youtubers, Ms. Hang plans to continue suing other names, including former model Trang Tran.

In response, Trang Tran still maintained an ironic attitude. On social networks, she said that the businesswoman is rich but "not luxurious", spending money on useless things. The former model also wittily begged for forgiveness: "Please forgive me, I flew back to sell vermicelli".

Ms. Phuong Hang "beat" Nguyen Sin and 100 youtubers, immediately received harsh response Thảo Mai06:55:53 22/11/2024On the afternoon of November 21, Dai Nam Joint Stock Company issued a notice that many individuals on social networks posted false information, slandered and insulted the honor and dignity of the company's shareholders and legal entities.