Le Bong's film received criticism for its content lacking industry expertise

Le Bong's first film in the lead role - Missed Appointment With Green Day is currently receiving harsh criticism when an architect discovered a "gap" in his expertise and industry knowledge.

More or less created sympathy for the audience because of the good acting and visuals, but Missed a Date with Green Day caused controversy because of the dialogue and professional knowledge in the film. Specifically, an audience member who is an architect posted an article, pointing out a series of shortcomings in this work, revolving around Le Bong's female protagonist. In the film, Le Bong plays a young architect who has just recently entered the profession. She is enthusiastic and takes good care of customers, so she easily gets big projects. However, this character's way of communicating with customers is considered to have a serious problem.

Original post:

"Recently, VTV has made a few movies with the main character being an architect. This is a very happy thing for those working in the profession. Perhaps many children, after watching the movie, will dream of becoming architects?

However, perhaps because the scriptwriter did not have advice from people with expertise in architecture, the content about this industry is a bit corny, unintentionally spreading falsehoods about this profession. This makes it funny for us watching the movie, and the audience - our customers - may have an even more distorted view of the architect's work.

This profession is already at the bottom of society, please stop drowning it with false views!

For example in this paragraph, when asked why he did not like the design of the building. The main character says, "Because it has both taste and no taste. There is a lack of a decisive choice."

Oh my gosh, there's no other architect who speaks like those Mother Addicts. Because the concept of "Gu" has no meaning in Architecture. It sounds very senseless. No architect with formal education would say that.

When we architects talk about the design of a building, we talk about style, proportion, consistency... or in general about design language. Or the relationship between function and form. But "taste" is as vague as the customer's wishes.

"Taste" will be different from "style". People can talk about "design style", but no one calls it "design taste". When talking about "taste", it means talking about preferences, and that belongs to the customer, not the architect when designing a project.

It can be said "whether the design style suits the customer's taste or not" but not "the architect's design taste". It sounds very messy.

Perhaps the writer's intention in this paragraph is to say that the building's design does not have a clear and specific style, and is a bit hybrid. However, architects usually do not criticize other people's works because of that. Because it depends on many subjective factors, and also personal feelings.

When reviewing a project, we often talk about function! Because that is the soul of the design and speaks to the architect's ability.

Then there is the design without advance payment. Besides that, there are so many options! If a customer finishes watching this movie and then leaves us like that, he will probably... quit his job.

There are many more things that cannot be said, but I'm just itching to write a few lines. But I admit that the movies VTV is making now are worth watching. Beautiful actors, nice camera angles, good colors, good dialogue. The thing is, you should seek more professional advice to avoid being naive."

In the comments section, this architect received a lot of sympathy from his colleagues. His post attracted many likes, comments and shares widely from the online community.

In fact, this is not the first time Vietnamese primetime films have encountered problems with professional knowledge. Previously, films like Kettle Fire (medical knowledge, firefighting), Justice Journey (legal knowledge),... also met with similar feedback. Wrongly conveying information about the specifics of the profession makes these films accidentally become "ridiculous" in the eyes of the audience.

The movie with Le Bong ended up being controversial, h.ot Tiktoker was criticized for acting stiffly, crying "fakely" Bút Chì17:35:51 22/05/2024Missing an appointment with Green Day during its broadcast always received mixed opinions from the audience. After the final episode aired, the film continued to be criticized for not having a c.limax and moving too quickly.