HH MGI was stripped of her crown, accused the organizers of being 'cheap', did all kinds of livestreaming and was banned by Nawat

Miss Grand Organizing Committee has been dominating the international media these past few days as the battle between the reigning Miss and the Organizing Committee has become increasingly tense. Both sides have presented arguments to prove that they are right and that the other side is unprofessional.

After being stripped of the Miss Grand International 2024 crown by the Miss Grand International ( MGI ) organization, Rachel Gupta - the representative of India - spoke out to "fight back", revealing the hidden corners of the living conditions and work pressure she had to face during her tenure. Rachel 's sharing has created a new wave of controversy, causing the public to raise many questions about MGI's management and treatment of beauty queens.

According to Rachel Gupta , after being crowned, she was not allowed to live in conditions worthy of the title of Miss Grand International . The beauty queen said that the MGI organization arranged for her to stay in a small room, far from the city center, lacking basic amenities. In particular, Rachel was also cut off from all means of communication and transportation: "no shuttle" and "no phone SIM card for communication" . This caused her to fall into a state of near isolation, facing countless difficulties in daily life and work.

Rachel 's financial situation was also a notable point in her accusation. Instead of being fully supported by the organization with living expenses worthy of an international beauty queen, Rachel Gupta said she "had to ask her family for money to pay for her living expenses" . This is completely contrary to what the public often imagines about the life of a beauty queen, which is supposed to be full and funded by the organization. Rachel 's story painted a picture of the lack and financial pressure she endured during her reign.

Not only facing difficult living conditions, Rachel Gupta also revealed another worrying aspect of her job: "she herself became a salesperson". The beauty queen said she was forced to promote and sell products, but "bad products". This made Rachel always feel "guilty" towards those who trusted and bought products based on her recommendations.

Rachel 's accusations have raised concerns about the business ethics and social responsibility of some beauty organizations. Turning beauty queens into "tools" to promote products without regard to quality, or even poor quality products, not only damages the reputation of the beauty queens but also directly affects consumers. A beauty queen, as a public figure and representative of beauty and intelligence, should be someone who inspires and spreads good values, not someone who sells products that she does not believe in.

Rachel Gupta ’s revelations about the poor living conditions and work pressure are in stark contrast to the allegations made by MGI Chairman Nawat Itsaragrisil . Nawat had previously accused Rachel of failing to complete her duties, engaging in outside activities without permission, refusing to work, and demanding high salaries. He even claimed that Rachel had contacted the sponsoring cosmetic hospital to request free cosmetic surgery for her mother.

This "back and forth" confrontation is turning into a tense media war. Each side has presented arguments and evidence to defend themselves, while "accusing" the other side. This makes it difficult for the public to determine the truth and make an objective assessment. However, information from both sides shows a not-so-good picture of the relationship between the MGI organization and their reigning beauty queen.

Rachel Gupta , born in 2004, was crowned Miss Grand International 2024 in October last year. She is the first representative of India to be crowned at the Miss Grand International arena. Her victory received much support from the audience.

Nawat 'stripped' of the reigning Miss title, 1st runner-up appointed in her place, Top 5 failed? Moon13:57:46 29/05/2025Recently, an incident shook the global beauty world when the reigning MGI voluntarily gave up her crown and openly accused the Organizing Committee of disrespecting her. This is considered a serious incident that rarely happens in the history of beauty contests.