Sending the bank 3 billion, 8 years is exactly 300k, the couple was shocked, the police stepped in

The online community is extremely confused by the story of a couple, saving in the bank 3 billion, but after 8 years only 300 thousand in the account. The police immediately stepped in, 3 people were arrested.

He and his wife are the owners of a fruit shop in Beijing, China. After 8 years of hard work and living on a frugal basis, the two have accumulated enough money to buy a new, more spacious and spacious house.

After careful calculation, 2 Mr. Enemy and his wife went to the real estate brokerage center to choose for themselves a satisfactory house. After that, both parties proceeded to sign the house purchase and sale procedures. Thinking they had a new home to live in, the two were stunned when the agent told them their bank cards couldn't afford to pay.

Accordingly, after many card swipes but the POS machine reported insufficient balance, the broker smiled sheepishly and asked Mr. Enemy and his wife if they took the wrong card. However, both couples insist all of the family's savings are on that bank card.

Faced with the unexpected situation, Mr. Enemy and his wife had to go to a nearby ATM to check the balance. The result shocked both of them, with less than 100 yuan (nearly 343,000 VND) on their bank cards. Seeing this, Mr. Enemy and his wife rushed to the bank to clarify the reason. There, they were told by bank staff that the amount of 950,000 yuan (more than 3.2 billion VND) in the card had been withdrawn one after another over the years. Not only that, the two couples also have a loan of 1.5 million yuan (more than 5.1 billion VND) that is overdue but unpaid.

This news to him and his wife was like lightning striking across their ears. According to shared, the couple has never gone to the bank to borrow money, so the debt is absurd. Realizing that the problem was serious, the teller quickly reported the incident to the bank leadership. However, this person had a very arrogant attitude, bluntly said that it was Mr. Enemy and his wife who withdrew the money and asked the 2 of them to quickly pay the debt.

Not only did he not find a reason for losing money, he and his wife were also threatened by the bank's leader with imprisonment if they did not pay their debts and were sent back by security guards. 3 days later, the two went to the bank's head again and demanded that the bank return their deposits. However, the results were no better, forcing them to resort to the intervention of the Chinese police.

At the police station, the bank's leaders, when listening to Mr. Enemy and his wife's presentation, repeatedly denied and affirmed that the bank was not involved in the incident. He also emphasized that he and his wife still have a debt of 1.5 million yuan but have not yet paid it.

After taking over the case, the police began investigating the incident. The investigation results showed that the loss of 950,000 yuan and the "sky-falling" debt of Mr. and Mrs. Enemy were carried out by relevant bank insiders. Those involved in the incident were later apprehended by police.

Accordingly, the amount of 950,000 yuan was transferred to the account of a man surnamed Li in three installments. The person who carried out these transactions was an employee surnamed Gao who worked at the bank and was also the wife of the man surnamed Li.

Under the temptation of money, these 2 people and another employee surnamed Su also worked at the bank planned and committed the wrongdoing. According to the testimony of the Li family, after the money arrived in the account, he also immediately spent all the money. And yet, the loan of 1.5 million yuan in the name of Mr. Enemy and his wife was also made by these 3 people. After the incident broke, the employee surnamed Gao also resigned from the bank.

In court, the representative of the bank argued that the bank was not the party responsible for the lost money of Mr. and Mrs. Enemy and attributed all responsibility to employees surnamed Gao. However, the couple's lawyer argued that the suspect had caused them economic losses during their time at the bank. Therefore, the bank still needs to take primary responsibility for this incident.

This was recognized by the judge, who ruled that the bank must pay back 950,000 yuan to the couple and confirmed that they did not have to repay the 1.5 million yuan loan. However, the bank refused to do so and appealed to a higher court, delaying the case by half a year.

Finally, under the review of the high court, the bank remains accordingly liable in this case. Eventually, the bank repaid the couple 950,000 yuan and interest due, and forgave the family's 1.5 million yuan loan.

Elementary school teacher writes letter refusing November 20 gift, a principal gives surprising opinion Đông Nguyễn17:39:02 19/11/2024Many teachers refused fresh flowers on November 20, instead wishing their students to achieve good results. This simple but meaningful action quickly spread and received support from netizens.