Tieu Chien reunited with Vuong Nhat Bac after many years, hotsearch exploded with fans crying

3 | 0 Discuss | Share
Public opinion in China was shocked when a 73-year-old man went for a cardiology check-up but was diagnosed with "early pregnancy." This unusual incident stunned his family and sparked intense debate about the loopholes in medical data management in the digital age.
"Medical miracle" or a disastrous mistake in medical records?
The incident began in mid-January 2026, when a 73-year-old man from the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (China) went to Wuzhong People's Hospital for a health check-up due to chest discomfort. It was a routine cardiovascular check-up, with no gynecological issues involved. Everything went smoothly at the hospital until his family received the electronic report a week later.
Right in the diagnostic section, the words "Early intrauterine pregnancy, possibility of fetal growth arrest not ruled out" appeared in a completely illogical manner. The report even described the size of the uterus and gestational sac in detail, like a real obstetric record. What's even more absurd is that right above these diagnostic lines, the patient's personal information is still clearly displayed: Male, 73 years old. This ridiculous contradiction was quickly shared by the family on social media, creating a "storm" of sarcastic comments questioning whether medicine has advanced to the point of allowing men to become pregnant or if this is an unannounced "scientific miracle."
A belated apology and a "hilarious" system glitch.
Under pressure from public opinion and a wave of criticism from the online community, on January 30th, Wuzhong People's Hospital officially issued a statement explaining the incident. According to the hospital representative, the paper report that the patient received directly at the medical facility was completely accurate and reflected the elderly man's cardiovascular condition correctly. However, a serious error occurred in the digitization and electronic data transmission process.
Specifically, a sudden technical glitch in the hospital's management software system caused the elderly man's medical records to be swapped with the examination results of another female patient. This error was further exacerbated by the irresponsible actions of the staff responsible for data verification, who failed to thoroughly review the data before releasing the electronic report. The hospital acknowledged this as a serious procedural error and offered a sincere apology to the elderly man and his family. They also committed to reviewing the entire system to ensure that no further unusual "pregnancy" cases occur with other male patients.
Photo: Illustration
Gaps in healthcare digital transformation: When technology lacks human oversight.
Although the incident ended with an apology and reconciliation, the story of the 73-year-old man who was "pregnant" leaves a bitter taste in the mouth regarding the inaccuracies in healthcare management. In the context of hospitals racing to switch to electronic records to optimize medical care, the incident in Ningxia serves as a costly warning. A small discrepancy in the order code or carelessness in data entry can lead to disastrous misunderstandings, not only shocking patients but also potentially causing errors in treatment protocols if not detected in time.
Photo: Illustration
This case once again confirms a fact: no matter how modern and intelligent medical technology becomes, close human supervision remains the crucial factor. Machines may malfunction, but the careful work ethic of the medical team is the shield protecting the rights and health of patients. This bittersweet story will undoubtedly be recalled as a prime example of the potential risks in the operation of healthcare in the digital age.
The man carries a "pregnant" belly from birth, after many years gives birth to a 9 kg "baby"
Phi Đức11:17:31 12/02/2024In 2003, a man in Chongqing (China) was always teased for his big belly, but did not expect that when he arrived at the hospital, he actually gave birth to a 9kg baby by caesarean section!

3 | 0 Discuss | Share

4 | 0 Discuss | Share

4 | 0 Discuss | Share

3 | 0 Discuss | Share

2 | 0 Discuss | Share

3 | 0 Discuss | Share

3 | 0 Discuss | Share

2 | 0 Discuss | Share

4 | 0 Discuss | Share

2 | 0 Discuss | Share

1 | 0 Discuss | Share

1 | 0 Discuss | Share








2 | 0 Discuss | Report