Mr. Dam was teased by Hoang Nguyen Vu for being hyperactive, Vietnamese lawyer leaked the lawsuit results?

Since the news of Mr. Dam filing a lawsuit against his best friend for losing several toes appeared on social media, viewers thought he was the victi.m until the clip of the scene was widely shared. Netizens probably already know the cause.

Along with that, public opinion is interested in the possibility of who will win the case of singer Dam Vinh Hung suing Mr. Gerard Richard Williams - singer Bich Tuyen's husband - to compensate 15 million USD. However, without knowing the result, but watching the clip of Mr. Dam 'dancing', journalist Hoang Nguyen Vu shared a post on his personal page.

Specifically, Hoang Nguyen Vu used words like 'innocent' and 'hyperactive' to talk about Mr. Dam's dangerous incident. In addition, this journalist also mentioned a character appearing next to Dam Vinh Hung in the video, who is said to have 'encouraged' the male singer to 'show off' during the high moment at the party.

"You and the youngest brother, who would have ever incited Dam to jump onto the water tray and sit, to cause this situation! Dam could sing standing below, dancing around the fountain was enough, being small and lively like that was enough. However, two girls (I heard that one of the two girls was a singer, Dam's sworn sister), tilted the tray and flipped it, seeing that it seemed sturdy, so they incited Dam to sit on it and sing...".

The article quickly attracted thousands of interactions, some netizens left comments such as: "Their tray is wobbly and sitting on it causes consequences, they don't sue for compensation. Why is it so absurd and unreasonable to sue?", "They broke into someone else's house and still demand compensation of 50 million USD", "So from then on, there was a new name: Phlegm and 7-claw cough", "In principle, the water tray is a stack of plates attached, only for decoration purposes. So when jumping on it, it tilted and fell. I think Dam will definitely lose. But still don't doubt the matter of colluding to profit. If this happens, it will be hard to swallow in a capitalist country".

At the end of the status line, journalist Hoang Nguyen Vu said, "When you go to someone's house, you can jump wherever you want. Now, there's no reason to jump on top of the cupboard, it's tiring. Lesson learned: Limit inviting other people to your house, especially those who are hyperactive and have a few younger sisters or friends who like to incite stupid things like that. Avoid it!", causing a stir in the online community, because most people agreed.

While Vietnamese netizens were wondering what percentage of Mr. Dam's chances of winning the case were, Lawyer Nguyen Thanh Ha - Chairman of SBLAW, Hanoi Bar Association - after consulting with a fellow lawyer in the US, said that the plaintiff (singer Dam Vinh Hung) had a very high chance of winning the case.

Mr. Ha said that, under common law, anyone has a "duty of care" towards others and also a "duty of warning" about possible dangers.

In addition, because Mr. Williams invited Dam Vinh Hung as a guest, Mr. Williams had a higher duty to ensure the safety of his guests. This included maintaining the property in a safe condition, regularly inspecting it, and warning guests of any dangers that Mr. Williams knew or should have known about. Mr. Williams appears to have breached these duties.

Lawyer Nguyen Van Hau - Vice Chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City Bar Association - also said that in the case of organizing a party with many attendees, the party host is responsible for ensuring the safety of all guests and related people within the scope of the party.

Existing objects at the venue will be assessed as a source of danger. When an object is a source of high danger, the host must take precautions throughout the event to ensure the safety of all those present at the venue. And the attendees are also responsible for operating within the scope permitted by the host.

If the party host can prove that he has taken the necessary steps to ensure safety and that the damage occurred due to the excessive behavior of the attendees, the party host will not be liable for compensation for any arising cases.

According to Attorney Ha, the Superior Court of California will be the place with jurisdiction to resolve the case, not the Supreme Court of California, because this is the highest court. The case should be brought to a local court, that is, the Superior Court has jurisdiction to resolve the case.

Nghi vấn Quang Lê về phe vợ chồng Bích Tuyền khịa đàn anh Đàm Vĩnh Hưng? Minh Lợi06:58:03 27/11/2024Sau gần 9 tháng xảy ra sự cố, Đàm Vĩnh Hưng bất ngờ đệ đơn kiện đồi bồi thường 15 triệu đô vì cho rằng vợ chồng tỷ phú Gerard Williams không bảo trì các hạng mục xây dựng.