No O No after noisy disparage the poor: Views are still terrible, or livestream speaks morally, is applauded

TikToker No O No is a notorious name with a series of food reviews. He also encountered a fierce wave of "boycott" of netizens for disrespecting the poor and the elderly.

The incident has also passed half a year, but until now, when it comes to No O No, people immediately think of a disparaging sentence: "Helo poor old woman in the middle of a lonely winter".

Because of the thoughtless words, deliberately fishing the view that led to the violation of the moral standard, TikToker No O No immediately suffered a huge storm of "blocking" of the online community.

After being criticized for filming a series of annoying and annoying videos, TikToker No O No posted a video explaining. In particular, due to the great pressure of public opinion, he had to go to the old woman's house to apologize.

Then, a series of incidents came from being bluntly deleted by the TikTok platform, to being invited to work by the authorities and at the same time No O No also had to pay a fine of 7.5 million dong.

Despite the act of posting repentance and asking everyone to give them a chance to correct their mistakes, No O No still "disappeared" using harsh words, lame comparisons and continued to be blocked by TikTok. personal account. Even, No O No burst into tears when a stranger physically impacted his face and bruised his face.

As can be seen, after each incident, No O No apologized as well as set up many other accounts and continued to win the title of view. It is not known how many TikTok nicks this guy has, but so far there is an account that has up to 300,000 followers and millions of views.

Even more surprising when male TikToker No O No continuously livestreamed talking about morality and received a lot of supportive and cheering comments.

The incident has been spreading across social platforms and attracting a lot of mixed opinions of the online community. Many people agree that this seems to be the common pattern of the scandalous TikTokers "The formula will be to create Drama then bleach, then the period when I have grown up, I have grown up and become a child. people like this and that."

In addition, some people simultaneously called for a boycott of No O No's TikTok channel, not wanting him to continue operating on this platform.

It seems that the consequences that No Ono received is extremely large. Can TikToker No O No continue to grow in this content creation field, what do you think about this?

It can be seen that in the past time, the fact that many TikTokers have self-labeled "reviewers" to attack and make one-sided assessment of product quality makes the public bored. Obviously, the easy way to earn a high income and the "virtual aura" on Tiktok is creating a part of young people "in the power of social networks".

Specifically, recently, TikToker Vo Ha Linh is the name mentioned across social networking platforms. Famous for her cosmetic and food review videos, she owns 3.7 million followers on the TikTok platform. In particular, Ha Linh has many review clips that attract millions of views thanks to commenting and disparaging restaurants and eateries.

Many people think that Ha Linh's assessment is too one-sided and this TikToker does not have enough knowledge about the dishes and restaurants that I review. For example, when trying seafood soup, she constantly stirred and criticized it, covered her nose and criticized the fishy salad, said that the fried vegetables were too fat or the vegetables were too sour, etc.

This is not the first time TikToker has caused controversy when it comes to experiencing and evaluating the quality of eateries and restaurants. The online community has witnessed fierce confrontations between restaurants and TikTokers who have labeled themselves "War Gods review", "Holy food", "Skewed Reviewer" who use defamation and expose the restaurant to attract attention. attention.

More importantly, many acts show that Tiktokers deliberately review "dirty" to attack the reputation and brand of food business units. There are even places that have hung pictures of "forbidden doors", exempt from service when these people set foot in the shop.

In addition to the TikTokers specializing in restaurants, restaurants, cosmetics, etc., the online community has been stirred up by the appearance of many curses, content creators on this platform dressed in weird clothes. art events to attract attention and attract more followers.

After having a high following, these TikTokers will do business, sell online for profit and receive advertising bookings.

According to Dr. Culture Hoang Long, the reality of TikTokers labeled as experts is appearing massively and making it difficult for viewers to distinguish between objective information and the "trap" set by Tiktoker. Currently, there are many creators who quickly change their lives, possessing "huge" followers on social networks. This should have been a "guideline" directing them towards positive values, contributing to building people and a civilized society, but for some individuals, this has been overlooked, leading to unique content. Harmful, bullshit, lack of standards keep on being born.

However, over the past time, the strong response of public opinion and users has really brought into play.

"Many creators are going astray, making dirty content, asking for views. The reason for this also comes from the audience's need to hear and see, and many brands hire advertising. So, if people Using social networks, boycotting restaurants, eliminating dirty content, it is difficult for TikTokers with the illusion of power to survive," said Dr. Hoang Long.

Ha Linh still posted a clip of eating and drinking even though she announced that she would stop reviewing food, fans were angry: Don't change the concept Minh Lợi16:11:55 25/04/2023Although she once announced that she would stop doing food reviews, until now, Ha Linh still uploads eating clips on her Youtube channel. This action of the female youtuber continues to cause controversy. Explaining this, Ha Linh said it was a mukbang, not a review Accordingly...