The father of the hit song Mr. Dam sold it to Bich Tuyen's husband: Married 2 wives with identical names!

4 | 0 Discuss | Share
Dam Vinh Hung "fought" with Bich Tuyen's husband in the US, denounced the act of illegally transferring the lawsuit file, and at the same time asked the Federal Court to return the file to California and force the reimbursement of nearly 15,000 USD in attorney's fees after a series of unusually long proceedings.
Recently, male singer Dam Vinh Hung made a tough legal move when he and his lawyer submitted a petition of more than 20 pages, asking the US Federal Court to return the case file back to the California Superior Court â where the case originated.
According to the plaintiff, billionaire Gerard Williams â Ms. Bich Tuyen's husband, as well as the defendant â showed signs of serious violations when deliberately transferring the lawsuit from the state level to the federal level. Specifically, Williams filed a "Notice of Transfer" up to 8 months later than the 30-day deadline clearly stipulated in federal law. This is considered a procedural error that cannot be ignored.
Not stopping at the delay, Dam Vinh Hung also accused the defendant of violating the principle of "Forum Defendant Rule". This provision states that if the defendant is a citizen of the state where the lawsuit was initiated, it is not allowed to transfer the case to the Federal Court of that own state.
Dam Vinh Hung's legal team has presented a series of evidence to prove that Gerard Williams is actually a California resident. In several previous lawsuits in California Superior Court, Mr. Williams has claimed to be a "California resident" and even used his Fountain Valley address to sign legal papers. In addition, his filings in Texas and other states also confirm his residence in California. However, when filing a petition in federal court, the defendant declared that he was a Missouri citizen, a move that was allegedly "circumventing the law" to circumvent the regulations.
According to the plaintiff, this contradiction not only shakes Gerard Williams' reputation in court, but also damages Dam Vinh Hung when he has to spend more time, effort and money to hire a lawyer to handle useless procedures. Therefore, in the petition, Dam Vinh Hung's lawyer asked the Federal Court to quickly return the file to the California Superior Court. At the same time, the defendant needs to reimburse attorneys' fees of up to 14,994 USD â the amount that the plaintiff has spent to overcome the consequences of this misguided procedure.
The petition also points to another important point: Gerard Williams is said to have "waived the right" to transfer the case to the federal government quite early. The reason is that during the process of the case being accepted in the state court, he has repeatedly actively filed, argued and requested the application of legal procedures right here. According to federal precedent, the act of actively participating in proceedings in State Court means voluntarily waiving the right to take the case to a higher level.
Dam Vinh Hung's side said that Gerard Williams' move was actually only to prolong the time, slow down the trial process, thereby disadvantageous to the plaintiff.
If the Federal Court approves the petition, the lawsuit will be officially returned to the California Superior Court â where singer Dam Vinh Hung (legal name Hung Huynh) originally sued Gerard Williams. At that time, the defendant not only has to continue to face charges in California, but is also likely to have to pay nearly $15,000 in legal fees to the plaintiff.
This new development shows that the legal battle between Dam Vinh Hung and billionaire Gerard Williams is still long and potentially dramatic. The singer expressed his determination to pursue the lawsuit to the end to protect his rights and honor before American law.
Dam Vinh Hung was attacked by Bich Tuyen's husband, revealing a shocking move An chi10:27:21 13/08/2025The lawsuit between Dam Vinh Hung and billionaire Gerard Williams in the US entered a new phase when the defendant requested to transfer to federal court, opening up important legal turning points.
4 | 0 Discuss | Share
0 | 1 Discuss | Share
2 | 1 Discuss | Share
5 | 0 Discuss | Share
3 | 0 Discuss | Share
1 | 0 Discuss | Share
1 | 0 Discuss | Share
2 | 0 Discuss | Share
3 | 0 Discuss | Share
4 | 0 Discuss | Share
2 | 0 Discuss | Share
1 | 0 Discuss | Share
2 | 0 Discuss | Report