Amber Heard wears a dress in three court appearances with Johnny Depp, what is the meaning behind?

Appearing on the day the jury made the verdict of the case against Johnny Depp, Amber Heard wore a tight black dress. This is also the outfit that the female star wore on the day she filed for divorce and filed a lawsuit against her ex-husband.

According to the Daily Mail, in recent days, Amber Heard's black dress on the day the jury announced the verdict of the defamation lawsuit between her and Johnny Depp has become the focus of public ridicule on social networking platforms.

The audience attentively discovered the hugging black dress that had been worn by Hollywood stars twice before. Specifically, in 2016, when Heard applied to the court for an injunction against Depp after the divorce. The second time was in 2020, during the trial Depp sued News Group Newspaper (NGN), The Sun's parent company smeared him as an ex-wife beater.

At the time, Heard posted a picture of her wearing the dress twice, with the caption: "One dress, four years apart. Sometimes it's important to wear the same thing twice."

On social networks, many viewers mocked Heard. One account shared: "Sometimes it's important to wear the same dress three times. The day you ruined his life, the day you lied to the law, the day you lost."

"This dress is no longer lucky for her", "No matter what outfit, Heard is a loser"... are comments from the public.

On June 1 (local time), the court ruled that Johnny Depp won the defamation trial. He was awarded $15 million in damages, including $10 million in punitive damages and $5 million in punitive damages. However, because Virginia law limits the fine to $350,000, the actual amount awarded to the actor is $10.35 million.

As for Heard, after losing the lawsuit against her ex-husband, she decided to appeal. The actress's lawyer also said that the star did not pay $ 10.35 million in compensation to Depp.

On CBS News, attorney Spurgeon shared that Heard could file for bankruptcy. At that time, she was exempted from the $10 million in damages. However, Heard still had to pay $350,000 in punitive damages.

According to experts, Amber Heard lost her lawsuit against ex-husband Johnny Depp because she abused the Me Too movement.

Specifically, after receiving the verdict, Amber Heard stated that she was heartbroken because "the mountains of evidence are still not enough against the power and influence of my ex-husband". The actress asserted that she was even more disappointed that "this ruling affects many other women, it is a step backwards and leaves women subject to public humiliation".

However, the WSWS believes that the outcome of the trial is not a backward step because Amber Heard does not represent women in general and abused women in particular.

"Instead, she represents a class of selfish wealthy men and women who have tried to advance their interests, despite the far-reaching consequences, through the #MeToo campaign. Along with many other people in Hollywood, Heard took advantage of the loophole and looked for opportunities to win the favor of the media and entertainment industry," the newspaper commented.

The effects of the June 1 ruling are angering those in the Me Too movement. They consider the verdict of the Depp-Heard trial to be unreasonable and assert that Heard continues to survive the violence.

Rolling Stone has an article defending Amber Heard with the content that men are always the winners. In the article Why the Depp - Heard trial was brutal, BuzzFeed News commented: "Being a woman doesn't mean you're being punished by a man or something."

Meanwhile, New York Times columnist AO Scott commented: "The public is willing to accept Depp as flawed, vulnerable, human and considers Heard a monster. Because he's the pack. Mr. Fame and masculinity are mutually advantageous."

On many websites, supporters of Amber Heard claim that Johnny Depp's side is asking tough questions for his ex-wife. In fact, every case requires the accuser to ask thoroughly and comprehensively. No honest person can object to that.

The argument that Depp won the case because the actor's movie star status had little or no merit. In fact, as pointed out, Depp faced a high loss rate as he had previously lost a lawsuit against the British newspaper, denied his appeal and spent a long time ostracized, living under the label of a wife beater.

And instead of blaming Johnny Depp for being a celebrity, the public should ignore the media's hostility, seeing Depp as just another court judge. They have to spend months, if counted from the time of filing the lawsuit, three years to pursue the case. And it must be admitted that this is a completely equal game.

Ultimately, the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial had the positive effect of highlighting the narrowness of the #MeToo campaign and its isolation from the majority of the population, in both women and men.

Amber Heard sống tằn tiện, Johnny Depp "tăng giá", fan tranh nhau mua đồ cũ với giá đắt đỏ Hoàng Phúc08:01:05 24/06/2022Theo Page Six, món nợ 10,35 triệu USD chưa thanh toán cho Johnny Depp khiến Amber Heard phải sống tằn tiện, không được chi tiêu quá nhiều. Ngày 22/6 (giờ Mỹ), cô được nhìn thấy một mình đi siêu thị ở Hamptons, thành phố New York