The "fake" father of the female fraudster: Used to act in a VTV movie, the vice-president of the neighborhood group, claimed to be unrelated

The case of a bride named A. born in 1995 married and then appropriated 17 billion VND from the groom's family, more and more new details appeared. People couldn't help but be surprised, turned upside down by the words shared by A's "fake father".

Regarding the case of denouncing the girl with the "trick of the century", Ms. NL (who posted the denunciation on social networks) said that VA (27 years old, the accused) hired a man to be the "grandfather". rich dad" to deceive and appropriate the property of her family.

Through the research of reporter Dan Tri, the man mentioned as the father of VA named T., lives in Hanoi. Mr. T is an actor, appearing in several scenes in many VTV movies.

Reporter Dan Tri contacted Mr. T. and received an affirmation from this man that it was him, but he was not involved in the fraud (if any).

"I only played the role for the event company like some other roles. The fraud of the bride (VA - who was accused) was not related", Mr. T. shared.

This man emphasized himself as a military officer, never doing things that hurt his honor.

Regarding other information related to the VA and the allegations in the social media post, Mr. T. declined to answer.

In the denunciation post of Ms. NL, Mr. T. is said to appear at the "billion-dollar" wedding of the VA with Ms. L's brother-in-law. Mr. T. directly took the bride's hand and gave it to the groom at the ceremony. .

And yet, most recently, people shared a picture of A. and this hired father taking pictures to check-in together at home during Tet. The two were extremely close and loved each other when holding hands and smiling.

According to many people who claim to be Mr. T's neighbor, this man is locally the deputy leader of the residential group. Since the incident was spread on social networks and the press, the neighborhood group where Mr. T lives has been disturbed and discussed.

Regarding the above denunciation of the "trick of the century", talking to PV Dan Viet, lawyer Dr. Dang Van Cuong said that new information appeared on social networks, has not been verified, has not been approved by the agency. verification function.

Therefore, it is not clear what the truth is and if the victims do not report there will be no grounds for the authorities to intervene. New information is only one-way.

According to Mr. Cuong, the act of fraud is to devise a trick to make others give property and then appropriate it. If the fraudulent act appropriates assets of 2 million VND or more, the person who commits the fraudulent act may be prosecuted for criminal liability.

However, victims and victims of property appropriation through civil and economic transactions must report the incident to the authorities, present documents and evidence and coordinate with the authorities. Only the ability to prove that they are the victim of a fraud case will have grounds for handling.

As for the case of becoming a victim of deception, having property appropriated but not reporting, not asking the authorities to solve, there is no basis for settlement.

From the above analysis, Mr. Cuong said that the information about the "super-cheating bride" case has only appeared on social networks, has not been verified by the function, so it is not possible to conclude whether it is true or false.

In this case, those who claim to be victims of VA should write a denunciation and provide evidence for the authorities to consider.

If the victims have filed a criminal complaint, the investigating agency will consider classifying the application. If the content of the application and documents and evidence attached to the application have grounds to show that the case shows signs of property appropriation, the investigating agency will accept it for verification.

In case the letter states that the loan or property loan has not yet been returned but there are no grounds to show signs of fraud or abusing trust to appropriate property, the investigating agency will do not accept messages.

In case of receiving property through a civil transaction, then cheating, fleeing, using the property for illegal purposes leading to inability to return the property or having conditions to pay but deliberately failing to return the property. property, may also consider handling the abuse of trust to appropriate property.

"In this case, if the people who have transferred money to this girl make a denunciation and attach documents and evidence to prove fraud or abuse of trust to appropriate property, the investigating agency new to the game. Only posting on social networks is not valid, "- the expert emphasized.

The crew who made the wedding video of the 17 billion case spoke out, revealing the amount of money the CEO "super cheated" Bac Giang to invest in luxurious clothes Hoàng Phúc11:30:50 15/09/2022Regarding the 17 billion dong scam, a party claiming to be the studio that filmed the wedding video for the "super trick" female CEO of Bac Giang recently posted a status line recording feelings as well as revealing related facts. to dramas like this one. Specifically, on the...