The "Raising Em" project caused controversy again when it was discovered that the adopted baby had died earlier

Recently, the incident about Ms. Le Huong discovered many irregularities when participating in the "Raising Em" project, especially the fact that the baby has died but the adoption code is still active, causing public concern about the transparency and management process of charity activities.

The story revolving around the charity project "Raising Em" suddenly became the focus of attention when Ms. Le Huong (Hanoi) shared her confusing experience. In early March 2024, she registered to adopt a child at Nam Chieu Primary Boarding School No. 2 (Minh Luong commune, Lao Cai province). Everything seemed simple, until she discovered a series of abnormalities that made her stop participating after a short time.

What confused Ms. Huong the most was the timing of the breeding code. Although she only registered in March 2024, the project announced that her baby's code was calculated from September 2023 to May 2024. The fact that a "retention" code from the previous school year was transferred to a new person made her doubt the operation process. According to her, the code is usually only issued after the sponsor completes paying the fee for the school year, and if the payment is not made by October-November, the code will be revoked. However, in this case, the code that is almost expired in the school year is still retained to be issued to new people, creating a sense of inconsistency.

Not stopping there, after transferring the money, Ms. Huong waited for two months but did not receive any updated images of the baby. In May 2024, when she actively contacted the homeroom teacher, she was shocked to learn that the child had died in an accident two months ago. This information shocked her seriously, because according to her, the project side did not grasp the situation at all. They only announced that they would work with the school again and did not respond until July.

This delay makes many people who follow the story worried about the process of checking and checking information between the project and the school. In the context of volunteer activities receiving increasing attention, transparency and timely updates are key factors to maintain the trust of the community. The fact that a baby has died but the adoptive code is still retained and continues to receive money is what makes the public question many questions.

On social networks, many comments said that this incident was not only an "unfortunate incident" but also a reminder of the responsibility of charitable organizations in managing data and ensuring the interests of donors. Some people expressed sympathy for Ms. Huong when she fell into an awkward situation, and at the same time hoped that the project would soon give a clear explanation to avoid affecting the overall reputation of volunteer activities.

On the other hand, there is also a view that it is necessary to listen to more information from the project and the school before making a conclusion. However, the common point of the opinions is that all activities related to children, especially in highland environments, must be carried out more carefully and transparently. This is not just a story about a breeding code, but also a matter of trust, which is very fragile in kindness-based activities.

According to the law, organizations calling for donations must ensure publicity, transparency and responsibility for the information provided to the community. Incidents like these, whether stemming from management errors or lack of updates, need to be clarified to avoid misleading and affecting programs that are truly providing value to children in disadvantaged areas.

Ms. Huong's story is therefore not only a personal experience, but also a reminder of the importance of monitoring, checking and transparency in all volunteer activities. When kindness is in the right place, it makes positive changes. But when the process is lacking, that kindness is very vulnerable.

Hoang Hoa Trung spoke out in the midst of a series of abnormalities at "Raising Em", answering questions Tuyết Anh11:12:43 09/12/2025When the Raising Em project appeared a series of reflections on transparency, duplicate codes, locked accounts and difficulty contacting the person in charge in Nghe An, Hoang Hoa Trung spoke up to admit the operation error, ready to go public for verification while the authorities verified